summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/LICENSES/CC-PDDC.txt
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* src/mb: Update unlicensable files with the CC-PDDC SPDX IDMartin Roth2022-08-131-23/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These files contain no creative content, and therefore have no copyright. This effectively means that they are in the public domain. This commit updates the unlicensable empty (and effectively empty) files with the CC-PDDX identifier for license compliance scanning. Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com> Change-Id: I0b76921a32e482b6aed154dddaba368f29ac2207 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66497 Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
* util/lint & LICENSES: Add PDDC as a "license" for corebootMartin Roth2022-08-101-0/+27
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication and Certification is not a license in the common sense in that it's stating that the associated file is already in the public domain (having no copyright), and is not actually putting it in the public domain like the CC-C0 license does. The use for this in coreboot is for unlicensable files - either blank files or files with no creative content. This allows these files to have the SPDX identifier to identify them as having no known copyright for open source license compliance. If CC-PDM-1.0 is ever included in the list of SPDX licenses, that would probably fit better, but because the public domain mark isn't actually a license, and because "public domain" isn't well defined, CC-PDM was rejected as a SPDX identifier. For further information: https://web.archive.org/web/20201018194411/https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/988 Change-Id: Ibb300ecd066cde2a016195c2beca76a460c588e3 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/66496 Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>