| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is enabled by CONFIG_RAMPAYLOAD.
The code will look for a ram payload and, if it is found, try
to run it. If the load fails or the payload returns it will
continue with ramstage.
We also include a new payload, linuxcheck, which is intended
to verify that linux can be loaded and run, e.g. as a LinuxBoot
payload. Currently, it fails.
This does not yet work but it makes sense as a foundation on which
to build. For one thing, we need to build at least a few tables
for Linux. The goal for LinuxBoot is to build as few as possible.
To test with linuxcheck (linux is not even close to working):
cd payloads/linuxcheck/
cp x86config .config
make
cd ../..
make
./build/cbfstool build/coreboot.rom add-payload -n fallback/rampayload -f payloads/linuxcheck/linuxcheck.elf
qemu-system-x86_64 -nographic -m 8192 -bios build/coreboot.rom -monitor /dev/pts/$1 -s
We need to change the payload menu so we can add a rampayload but it's a bit
tricky as written, so that must come later.
Note that I'm still creating a special purpose romselfboot. The idea of
merging romselfboot and selfboot is probably a good idea -- in the future.
I think until we know how this should look, such a merge is premature.
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I8199aae6776f6dee969b370b0e6a41ef96e854d8
clang-formatted-by: Ronald G. Minnich
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28402
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
WARNING: char * array declaration might be better as static const
WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
WARNING: break is not useful after a goto or return
WARNING: Single statement macros should not use a do {} while (0) loop
WARNING: sizeof *t should be sizeof(*t)
WARNING: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I39d49790c5eaeedec5051e1fab0b1279275f6e7f
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18865
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
|
It never made sense to have bootblock_* in init, but
pirq_routing.c in boot, and some ld scripts on the main
level while others live in subdirectories.
This patch flattens the directory hierarchy and makes
x86 more similar to the other architectures.
Change-Id: I4056038fe7813e4d3d3042c441e7ab6076a36384
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10901
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
