From 4d3aa60ac769e38cc24b690dbd371bc1391e4084 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tillmann Severin Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:18:41 +0100 Subject: Documentation: Fix trivial typo in the "Coding Style" chapter This should not have any impact on produced binaries. Due to the simplicity, the patch has not been tested. Change-Id: Ic52f2be6a91aa3534d222f08733d1ba8bc1265a9 Signed-off-by: Tillmann Severin Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80140 Reviewed-by: Felix Singer Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) --- Documentation/contributing/coding_style.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Documentation') diff --git a/Documentation/contributing/coding_style.md b/Documentation/contributing/coding_style.md index bdf6c602193d..8828da48fab5 100644 --- a/Documentation/contributing/coding_style.md +++ b/Documentation/contributing/coding_style.md @@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ eDP display panel encounters an I2C error, it should print a "cannot read EDID" message and return an error code. The calling display initialization function knows that without the EDID there is no way to initialize the display correctly, so it will also immediately return with an error code without running its -remaining code that would initialize the SoC's display controller. Exeuction +remaining code that would initialize the SoC's display controller. Execution returns further up the function stack to the mainboard initialization code which continues booting despite the failed display initialization, since display functionality is non-essential to the system. (Code is encouraged but -- cgit v1.2.3