summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnastasia Klimchuk <aklm@flashrom.org>2024-05-25 21:51:34 +1000
committerAnastasia Klimchuk <aklm@flashrom.org>2024-06-06 10:32:57 +0000
commit1ed95233e8872c80575db1666d8cb65dbaf5595b (patch)
tree65d308bf8bdbde4e1494ea312ba25a3f8e314bb1 /Documentation
parente25129d9b6cf5bc39fed03cbf60af2378a3e745f (diff)
downloadflashrom-1ed95233e8872c80575db1666d8cb65dbaf5595b.tar.gz
flashrom-1ed95233e8872c80575db1666d8cb65dbaf5595b.tar.bz2
flashrom-1ed95233e8872c80575db1666d8cb65dbaf5595b.zip
doc: Convert ME and Intel docs
ME page existed on wiki here https://wiki.flashrom.org/ME The contents are mostly unchanged, but one broken kernel link is removed from Intel doc. Change-Id: I79af5674f3af9ca880e89becd6a272a2cf8ed599 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@flashrom.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82649 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/mysteries_intel.txt173
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 173 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/mysteries_intel.txt b/Documentation/mysteries_intel.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 088abb877..000000000
--- a/Documentation/mysteries_intel.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,173 +0,0 @@
-= BBAR on ICH8 =
- There is no sign of BBAR (BIOS Base Address Configuration Register) in the
- public datasheet (or specification update) of the ICH8. Also, the offset of
- that register has changed between ICH7 (SPIBAR + 50h) and ICH9 (SPIBAR +
- A0h), so we have no clue if or where it is on ICH8. Out current policy is to
- not touch it at all and assume/hope it is 0.
-
-= Software Sequencing vs. Hardware Sequencing and the "Opaque flash chip" =
-Software sequencing and hardware sequencing are two methods used to interface
-with the SPI controller on Intel platforms. They can be selected using either
-ich_spi_mode=swseq or ich_spi_mode=hwseq programmer parameters. Flashrom will
-attempt to automatically detect which mode to use.
-
-Software sequencing is the traditional method whereby software running on the
-CPU handles most of the logic needed to interact with the flash chip. This
-offers good flexibility since the user can utilize any opcode available in the
-OPMENU registers, and OPMENU can be left unlocked or on coreboot-supported
-platforms the owner of the system may program it for their needs before locking
-it. Advanced or non-standard features of a chip such as write protection and
-OTP may therefore be directly utilized by software.
-
-Hardware sequencing is a newer method (since around 2011) whereby most of the
-logic for interacting with the SPI flash chip is contained within the SPI
-controller itself and software such as flashrom may only select a few operations
-chosen by Intel via the Flash Cycle (FCYCLE) field. The chip must conform to
-specifications from Intel for each chipset/PCH. The specs are given in the
-"SPI Programming Guide" application note. See [SPI_PROG] cited at the bottom of
-this document for an example.
-
-Hardware sequencing simplifies things from a software perspective since the
-software is guaranteed some minimal level of support and doesn't even need to
-know the chip's ID or opcodes; it just needs to tell the SPI controller to
-perform a type of transaction such as "read", "4k block erase", etc. Hence when
-using hardware sequencing one will see "Opaque flash chip" as the chip's
-description since software might not be able to identify the chip. The SPI
-controller can combine multiple physical flash chips to logically appear as a
-single large flash device, and in such cases it would not make sense for
-flashrom to try to identify the chip.
-
-In many non-Intel systems the software has full control of a generic SPI
-controller where the software controls the SPI signals and also constructs the
-data payload including pre-op (e.g. write enable latch), opcode, address, and
-data. Intel SPI flash controllers are purpose-built for flash chip access and
-the software does not control the hardware directly. This makes Intel SPI
-controllers less flexible from a software standpoint, however there are some
-benefits such as guaranteed atomicity and multi-master arbitration needed for
-modern Intel platforms where the CPU and various microprocessors can share the
-same flash chip.
-
-= SMM BIOS Write Protection =
-Sometimes a hardware vendor will enable "SMM BIOS Write Protect" (SMM_BWP)
-in the firmware during boot time. The bits that control SMM_BWP are in the
-BIOS_CNTL register in the LPC interface.
-
-When enabled, the SPI flash can only be written when the system is operating in
-in System Management Mode (SMM). In other words, only certain code that was
-installed by the BIOS can write to the flash chip. Programs that run in OS
-context such as flashrom can still read the flash chip, but cannot write to the
-flash chip.
-
-Flashrom will attempt to detect this and print a warning such as the following:
-"Warning: BIOS region SMM protection is enabled!"
-
-Many vendor-supplied firmware update utilities do not actually write to the ROM;
-instead they transfer data to/from memory which is read/written by a routine
-running in SMM and is responsible for writing to the firmware ROM. This causes
-severe system performance degradataion since all processors must be in SMM
-context (ring -2) instead of OS context (ring 0) while the firmware ROM is being
-written.
-
-= Accesses beyond region bounds in descriptor mode =
- Intel's flash image tool will always expand the last region so that it covers
- the whole flash chip, but some boards ship with a different configuration.
- It seems that in descriptor mode all addresses outside the used regions can not
- be accessed whatsoever. This is not specified anywhere publicly as far as we
- could tell. flashrom does not handle this explicitly yet. It will just fail
- when trying to touch an address outside of any region.
- See also http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-August/007606.html
-
-= (Un)locking the ME region =
- If the ME region is locked by the FRAP register in descriptor mode, the host
- software is not allowed to read or write any address inside that region.
- Although the chipset datasheets specify that "[t]he contents of this register
- are that of the Flash Descriptor" [PANTHER], this is not entirely true.
- The firmware has to fill at least some of the registers involved. It is not
- known when they become read-only or any other details, but there is at least
- one HM67-based board, that provides an user-changeable setting in the firmware
- user interface to enable ME region updates that lead to a FRAP content that is
- not equal to the descriptor region bits [NC9B].
-
- There are different ways to unlock access:
-
- - A pin strap: Flash Descriptor Security Override Strap (as indicated by the
- Flash Descriptor Override Pin Strap Status (FDOPSS) in HSFS. That pin is
- probably not accessible to end users on consumer boards (every Intel doc i
- have seen stresses that this is for debugging in manufacturing only and
- should not be available for end users).
- The ME indicates this in bits [19:16] (Operation Mode) in the HFS register of
- the HECI/MEI PCI device by setting them to 4 (SECOVR_JMPR) [MODE_CTRL].
-
- - Intel Management Engine BIOS Extension (MEBx) Disable
- This option may be available to end users on some boards usually accessible
- by hitting ctrl+p after BIOS POST. Quote: "'Disabling' the Intel ME does not
- really disable it: it causes the Intel ME code to be halted at an early stage
- of the Intel ME's booting so that the system has no traffic originating from
- the Intel ME on any of the buses." [MEBX] The ME indicates this in
- bits [19:16] (Operation Mode) in the HFS register of the HECI/MEI PCI device
- by setting them to 3 (Soft Temporary Disable) [MODE_CTRL].
-
- - Previous to Ibex Peak/5 Series chipsets removing the DIMM from slot (or
- channel?) #0 disables the ME completely, which may give the host access to
- the ME region.
-
- - HMRFPO (Host ME Region Flash Protection Override) Enable MEI command
- This is the most interesting one because it allows to temporarily disable
- the ME region protection by software. The ME indicates this in bits [19:16]
- (Operation Mode) in the HFS register of the HECI/MEI PCI device by setting
- them to 5 (SECOVER_MEI_MSG) [MODE_CTRL].
-
-== MEI/HECI ==
- Communication between the host software and the different services provided by
- the ME is done via a packet-based protocol that uses MMIO transfers to one or
- more virtual PCI devices. Upon this layer there exist various services that can
- be used to read out hardware management values (e.g. temperatures, fan speeds
- etc.). The lower levels of that protocol are well documented:
- The locations/offsets of the PCI MMIO registers are noted in the chipset
- datasheets. The actually communication is documented in a whitepaper [DCMI] and
- an outdated as well as a current Linux kernel implementation (currently in
- staging/ exist [KERNEL]. There exists a patch that re-implements this in user
- space (as part of flashrom).
-
-== Problems ==
- The problem is that only very few higher level protocols are documented publicly,
- especially the bunch of messages that contain the HMRFPO commands is probably
- well protected and only documented in ME-specific docs and the BIOS writer's
- guides. We are aware of a few leaked documents though that give us a few hints
- about it, but nothing substantial regarding its implementation.
-
- The documents are somewhat contradicting each other in various points which
- might be due to factual changes in process of time or due to the different
- capabilities of the ME firmwares, example:
-
- Intel's Flash Programming Tool (FPT) "automatically stops ME writing to SPI
- ME Region, to prevent both writing at the same time, causing data corruption." [ME8]
-
- "FPT is not HMRFPO-capable, so needs [the help of the FDOPS pin] HDA_SDO if
- used to update the ME Region." [SPS]
-
- When looking at the various ME firmware editions (and different chipsets), things
- get very unclear. Some docs say that HMRFPO needs to be sent before End-of-POST
- (EOP), others say that the ME region can be updated in the field or that some
- vendor tools use it for updates. This needs to be investigated further before
- drawing any conclusion.
-
-[PANTHER] Intel 7 Series Chipset Family Platform Controller Hub (PCH) Datasheet
- Document Number: 326776, April 2012, page 857
-[NC9B] Jetway NC9B flashrom v0.9.5.2-r1517 log with ME region unlocked.
- NB: "FRAP 0e0f" vs. "FLMSTR1 0a0b".
- http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1215
-[MODE_CTRL] Client Platform Enabling Tour: Platform Software
- Document Number: 439167, Revision 1.2, page 52
-[MEBX] Intel Management Engine BIOS Extension (MEBX) User's Guide
- Revision 1.2, Section 3.1 and 3.5
-[DCMI] DCMI Host Interface Specification
- Revision 1.0
-[KERNEL] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree;f=drivers/staging/mei;hb=HEAD
-[SPI_PROG] Ibex Peak SPI Programming Guide
- Document Number: 403598, Revision 1.3, page 79
-[ME8] Manufacturing with Intel Management Engine (ME) Firmware 8.X on Intel 7 Series
- Revision 2.0, page 59
-[SPS] Manufacturing with Intel Management Engine (ME) on Intel C600 Series Chipset 1
- for Romley Server 2 Platforms using Server Platform Services (SPS) Firmware
- Revision 2.2, page 51