summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2017-01-30 09:59:57 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2017-02-04 00:05:29 +0100
commitfa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045 (patch)
tree0ddc8a0902ea5503648fe271092aa1dda385ab9f /drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
parentb12f7a2b01f7adebb9982a6547f4e930914829a9 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-fa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045.tar.gz
linux-stable-fa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045.tar.bz2
linux-stable-fa29ae5f221860e22a7346d89ae38a28ed104045.zip
ACPI: processor_perflib: Simplify code and stop using CPUFREQ_START
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() can live without using CPUFREQ_START (which is gonna be removed soon), as it is only used while setting ignore_ppc to 0. This can be done with the help of "ignore_ppc < 0" check alone. The notifier function anyway ignores all events except CPUFREQ_ADJUST and dropping CPUFREQ_START wouldn't harm at all. Once CPUFREQ_START event is removed from the cpufreq core, acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() will get called only for CPUFREQ_NOTIFY or CPUFREQ_ADJUST event. Drop the return statement from the first if block to make sure we don't ignore any such events. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c4
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index f0b4a981b8d3..18b72eec3507 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -75,10 +75,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct acpi_processor *pr;
unsigned int ppc = 0;
- if (event == CPUFREQ_START && ignore_ppc <= 0) {
+ if (ignore_ppc < 0)
ignore_ppc = 0;
- return 0;
- }
if (ignore_ppc)
return 0;