summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>2009-09-08 15:31:46 +0200
committerLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>2009-09-27 03:12:13 -0400
commit14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e (patch)
treeec3b36bc0a274ea382f5816a6919d82a59ac110f /drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
parentb684a3637e0887683a0a3d6fd471fc41d7c1606a (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e.tar.gz
linux-stable-14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e.tar.bz2
linux-stable-14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e.zip
ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message
The message "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver" is misleading. The device _may_ need an ACPI driver, if the BIOS implemented a custom API for the device in question (which, AFAIK, can't be checked.) If not, then either a generic ACPI driver may be used (for example "thermal"), or nothing can be done (other than a white list). I propose to reword the message to: ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver which I think is more correct. Comments and suggestions welcome. I also added a message warning about possible problems and system instability when users pass acpi_enforce_resources=lax, as suggested by Len. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/pci/setup-irq.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions