summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGuillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>2019-12-06 12:38:49 +0100
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2019-12-21 10:42:27 +0100
commite7a3b025b8c387fa65dc28c50db88642b1add300 (patch)
treeaf12df2727a1a1017e1667b108a76e38bfeea412 /include
parent0c8cd7f6bb8a53b244ecc498dc733204099b6cf3 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-e7a3b025b8c387fa65dc28c50db88642b1add300.tar.gz
linux-stable-e7a3b025b8c387fa65dc28c50db88642b1add300.tar.bz2
linux-stable-e7a3b025b8c387fa65dc28c50db88642b1add300.zip
tcp: Protect accesses to .ts_recent_stamp with {READ,WRITE}_ONCE()
[ Upstream commit 721c8dafad26ccfa90ff659ee19755e3377b829d ] Syncookies borrow the ->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp field to store the timestamp of the last synflood. Protect them with READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() since reads and writes aren't serialised. Use of .rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp for storing the synflood timestamp was introduced by a0f82f64e269 ("syncookies: remove last_synq_overflow from struct tcp_sock"). But unprotected accesses were already there when timestamp was stored in .last_synq_overflow. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/net/tcp.h6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index c446bfa2d039..0e3a88f808c6 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -494,17 +494,17 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
*/
static inline void tcp_synq_overflow(const struct sock *sk)
{
- unsigned long last_overflow = tcp_sk(sk)->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp;
+ unsigned long last_overflow = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(sk)->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp);
unsigned long now = jiffies;
if (!time_between32(now, last_overflow, last_overflow + HZ))
- tcp_sk(sk)->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = now;
+ WRITE_ONCE(tcp_sk(sk)->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp, now);
}
/* syncookies: no recent synqueue overflow on this listening socket? */
static inline bool tcp_synq_no_recent_overflow(const struct sock *sk)
{
- unsigned long last_overflow = tcp_sk(sk)->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp;
+ unsigned long last_overflow = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(sk)->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp);
/* If last_overflow <= jiffies <= last_overflow + TCP_SYNCOOKIE_VALID,
* then we're under synflood. However, we have to use