diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2017-04-25 14:00:49 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2017-07-21 08:12:23 +0200 |
| commit | 8f70f49650b428378320c12dee41122d9f9e258e (patch) | |
| tree | 5f5cdd5542bf9d22958cd7312fb09b612e23b50d /kernel | |
| parent | 49c159f59d5328cc86900fbb175356e1cb0be7f2 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-8f70f49650b428378320c12dee41122d9f9e258e.tar.gz linux-stable-8f70f49650b428378320c12dee41122d9f9e258e.tar.bz2 linux-stable-8f70f49650b428378320c12dee41122d9f9e258e.zip | |
sched/topology: Fix overlapping sched_group_mask
commit 73bb059f9b8a00c5e1bf2f7ca83138c05d05e600 upstream.
The point of sched_group_mask is to select those CPUs from
sched_group_cpus that can actually arrive at this balance domain.
The current code gets it wrong, as can be readily demonstrated with a
topology like:
node 0 1 2 3
0: 10 20 30 20
1: 20 10 20 30
2: 30 20 10 20
3: 20 30 20 10
Where (for example) domain 1 on CPU1 ends up with a mask that includes
CPU0:
[] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
[] domain 0: span 0-2 level NUMA
[] groups: 1 (mask: 1), 2, 0
[] domain 1: span 0-3 level NUMA
[] groups: 0-2 (mask: 0-2) (cpu_capacity: 3072), 0,2-3 (cpu_capacity: 3072)
This causes sched_balance_cpu() to compute the wrong CPU and
consequently should_we_balance() will terminate early resulting in
missed load-balance opportunities.
The fixed topology looks like:
[] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
[] domain 0: span 0-2 level NUMA
[] groups: 1 (mask: 1), 2, 0
[] domain 1: span 0-3 level NUMA
[] groups: 0-2 (mask: 1) (cpu_capacity: 3072), 0,2-3 (cpu_capacity: 3072)
(note: this relies on OVERLAP domains to always have children, this is
true because the regular topology domains are still here -- this is
before degenerate trimming)
Debugged-by: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e3589f6c81e4 ("sched: Allow for overlapping sched_domain spans")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index de691daea709..d0eb16373bf0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -5852,6 +5852,9 @@ enum s_alloc { * Build an iteration mask that can exclude certain CPUs from the upwards * domain traversal. * + * Only CPUs that can arrive at this group should be considered to continue + * balancing. + * * Asymmetric node setups can result in situations where the domain tree is of * unequal depth, make sure to skip domains that already cover the entire * range. @@ -5870,11 +5873,24 @@ static void build_group_mask(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *sg) for_each_cpu(i, sg_span) { sibling = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, i); - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sibling))) + + /* + * Can happen in the asymmetric case, where these siblings are + * unused. The mask will not be empty because those CPUs that + * do have the top domain _should_ span the domain. + */ + if (!sibling->child) + continue; + + /* If we would not end up here, we can't continue from here */ + if (!cpumask_equal(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sibling->child))) continue; cpumask_set_cpu(i, sched_group_mask(sg)); } + + /* We must not have empty masks here */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(sched_group_mask(sg))); } /* |