summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/netfilter
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>2018-07-17 07:17:56 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2018-09-05 09:26:27 +0200
commit123534dbd49094b9f68e53fffd8cbd8a9f9f976e (patch)
tree084d48f20d0041de61048d06de4027138672707c /net/netfilter
parent4a0144a43c526e6d8d274fce2e4241854ef8712c (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-123534dbd49094b9f68e53fffd8cbd8a9f9f976e.tar.gz
linux-stable-123534dbd49094b9f68e53fffd8cbd8a9f9f976e.tar.bz2
linux-stable-123534dbd49094b9f68e53fffd8cbd8a9f9f976e.zip
netfilter: nf_tables: don't allow to rename to already-pending name
[ Upstream commit c6cc94df65c3174be92afbee638f11cbb5e606a7 ] Its possible to rename two chains to the same name in one transaction: nft add chain t c1 nft add chain t c2 nft 'rename chain t c1 c3;rename chain t c2 c3' This creates two chains named 'c3'. Appears to be harmless, both chains can still be deleted both by name or handle, but, nevertheless, its a bug. Walk transaction log and also compare vs. the pending renames. Both chains can still be deleted, but nevertheless it is a bug as we don't allow to create chains with identical names, so we should prevent this from happening-by-rename too. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/netfilter')
-rw-r--r--net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c42
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 194674c96b98..742aacb317e5 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -1480,7 +1480,6 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
struct nft_base_chain *basechain;
struct nft_stats *stats = NULL;
struct nft_chain_hook hook;
- const struct nlattr *name;
struct nf_hook_ops *ops;
struct nft_trans *trans;
int err, i;
@@ -1531,12 +1530,11 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
return PTR_ERR(stats);
}
+ err = -ENOMEM;
trans = nft_trans_alloc(ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN,
sizeof(struct nft_trans_chain));
- if (trans == NULL) {
- free_percpu(stats);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ if (trans == NULL)
+ goto err;
nft_trans_chain_stats(trans) = stats;
nft_trans_chain_update(trans) = true;
@@ -1546,19 +1544,37 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
else
nft_trans_chain_policy(trans) = -1;
- name = nla[NFTA_CHAIN_NAME];
- if (nla[NFTA_CHAIN_HANDLE] && name) {
- nft_trans_chain_name(trans) =
- nla_strdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!nft_trans_chain_name(trans)) {
- kfree(trans);
- free_percpu(stats);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (nla[NFTA_CHAIN_HANDLE] &&
+ nla[NFTA_CHAIN_NAME]) {
+ struct nft_trans *tmp;
+ char *name;
+
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ name = nla_strdup(nla[NFTA_CHAIN_NAME], GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!name)
+ goto err;
+
+ err = -EEXIST;
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &ctx->net->nft.commit_list, list) {
+ if (tmp->msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN &&
+ tmp->ctx.table == table &&
+ nft_trans_chain_update(tmp) &&
+ nft_trans_chain_name(tmp) &&
+ strcmp(name, nft_trans_chain_name(tmp)) == 0) {
+ kfree(name);
+ goto err;
+ }
}
+
+ nft_trans_chain_name(trans) = name;
}
list_add_tail(&trans->list, &ctx->net->nft.commit_list);
return 0;
+err:
+ free_percpu(stats);
+ kfree(trans);
+ return err;
}
static int nf_tables_newchain(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,