From 3c6b1212d20bbbffcad5709ab0f2d5ed9b5859a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Limonciello Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:40:02 -0500 Subject: ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints When code uses a pre-increment it makes the reader question "why". In the constraint fetching code there is no reason for the variables to be pre-incremented so adjust to post-increment. No intended functional changes. Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c index ce62e61a9605..7711dde68947 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c @@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints_amd(void) acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle, "LPI: constraints list begin:\n"); - for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) { + for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) { union acpi_object *info_obj = &package->package.elements[j]; struct lpi_device_constraint_amd dev_info = {}; struct lpi_constraints *list; acpi_status status; - for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; ++k) { + for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; k++) { union acpi_object *obj = &info_obj->package.elements[k]; list = &lpi_constraints_table[lpi_constraints_table_size]; @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void) if (!package) continue; - for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) { + for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) { union acpi_object *element = &(package->package.elements[j]); @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void) constraint->min_dstate = -1; - for (j = 0; j < package_count; ++j) { + for (j = 0; j < package_count; j++) { union acpi_object *info_obj = &info.package[j]; union acpi_object *cnstr_pkg; union acpi_object *obj; -- cgit v1.2.3