From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/microblaze') diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c index 9e954959f605..1d6fad50fa76 100644 --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c @@ -190,17 +190,17 @@ static u64 xilinx_clock_read(void) return read_fn(timer_baseaddr + TCR1); } -static cycle_t xilinx_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 xilinx_read(struct clocksource *cs) { /* reading actual value of timer 1 */ - return (cycle_t)xilinx_clock_read(); + return (u64)xilinx_clock_read(); } static struct timecounter xilinx_tc = { .cc = NULL, }; -static cycle_t xilinx_cc_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc) +static u64 xilinx_cc_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc) { return xilinx_read(NULL); } -- cgit v1.2.3