From 8bb3fdd6863c3b6b84bbab750d6b35e889c1399d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:19:55 +0200 Subject: s390: rename psw_bits enums The address space enums that must be used when modifying the address space part of a psw with the psw_bits() macro can easily be confused with the psw defines that are used to mask and compare directly the mask part of a psw. We have e.g. PSW_AS_PRIMARY vs PSW_ASC_PRIMARY. To avoid confusion rename the PSW_AS_* enums to PSW_BITS_AS_*. In addition also rename the PSW_AMODE_* enums, so they also follow the same naming scheme: PSW_BITS_AMODE_*. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- arch/s390/mm/init.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/s390/mm') diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c index 0352f9f88c73..bc8c301f82b6 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void __init paging_init(void) __ctl_load(S390_lowcore.kernel_asce, 13, 13); psw.mask = __extract_psw(); psw_bits(psw).t = 1; - psw_bits(psw).as = PSW_AS_HOME; + psw_bits(psw).as = PSW_BITS_AS_HOME; __load_psw_mask(psw.mask); sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(MAX_NUMNODES); -- cgit v1.2.3