From 57f1c12e455fc6c4c0db2c9f14e57b95822c2321 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Anderson Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:50:17 -0700 Subject: spi: spi-geni-qcom: Remove confusing comment about setting the watermark The comment in setup_fifo_xfer() about setting the watermark wasn't quite proper grammar and also stopped making sense around commit 6d66507d9b55 ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Don't wait to start 1st transfer if transmitting"). After that commit we actually start the transfer _before_ the watermark interrupt comes. I don't think the comment really has any value anymore. We've already got a comment when we grab the spinlock saying that our interrupt can come any time as a result of the things in the locked section. Let's just remove it. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210712085010.1.Ie3bb9f9d30d6475bb75251d32635194c1c72b9ee@changeid Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c') diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c b/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c index b3861fb88711..2f51421e2a71 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c @@ -549,12 +549,6 @@ static void setup_fifo_xfer(struct spi_transfer *xfer, */ spin_lock_irq(&mas->lock); geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, m_cmd, FRAGMENTATION); - - /* - * TX_WATERMARK_REG should be set after SPI configuration and - * setting up GENI SE engine, as driver starts data transfer - * for the watermark interrupt. - */ if (m_cmd & SPI_TX_ONLY) { if (geni_spi_handle_tx(mas)) writel(mas->tx_wm, se->base + SE_GENI_TX_WATERMARK_REG); -- cgit v1.2.3