From fe342cf77bc3c3ba89e8bb1e4eddbe614df4efa4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 21:12:31 +0100 Subject: afs: Fix checker warnings Fix warnings raised by checker, including: (*) Warnings raised by unequal comparison for the purposes of sorting, where the endianness doesn't matter: fs/afs/addr_list.c:246:21: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer fs/afs/addr_list.c:246:30: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer fs/afs/addr_list.c:248:21: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer fs/afs/addr_list.c:248:49: warning: restricted __be32 degrades to integer fs/afs/addr_list.c:283:21: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer fs/afs/addr_list.c:283:30: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer (*) afs_set_cb_interest() is not actually used and can be removed. (*) afs_cell_gc_delay() should be provided with a sysctl. (*) afs_cell_destroy() needs to use rcu_access_pointer() to read cell->vl_addrs. (*) afs_init_fs_cursor() should be static. (*) struct afs_vnode::permit_cache needs to be marked __rcu. (*) afs_server_rcu() needs to use rcu_access_pointer(). (*) afs_destroy_server() should use rcu_access_pointer() on server->addresses as the server object is no longer accessible. (*) afs_find_server() casts __be16/__be32 values to int in order to directly compare them for the purpose of finding a match in a list, but is should also annotate the cast with __force to avoid checker warnings. (*) afs_check_permit() accesses vnode->permit_cache outside of the RCU readlock, though it doesn't then access the value; the extraneous access is deleted. False positives: (*) Conditional locking around the code in xdr_decode_AFSFetchStatus. This can be dealt with in a separate patch. fs/afs/fsclient.c:148:9: warning: context imbalance in 'xdr_decode_AFSFetchStatus' - different lock contexts for basic block (*) Incorrect handling of seq-retry lock context balance: fs/afs/inode.c:455:38: warning: context imbalance in 'afs_getattr' - different lock contexts for basic block fs/afs/server.c:52:17: warning: context imbalance in 'afs_find_server' - different lock contexts for basic block fs/afs/server.c:128:17: warning: context imbalance in 'afs_find_server_by_uuid' - different lock contexts for basic block Errors: (*) afs_lookup_cell_rcu() needs to break out of the seq-retry loop, not go round again if it successfully found the workstation cell. (*) Fix UUID decode in afs_deliver_cb_probe_uuid(). (*) afs_cache_permit() has a missing rcu_read_unlock() before one of the jumps to the someone_else_changed_it label. Move the unlock to after the label. (*) afs_vl_get_addrs_u() is using ntohl() rather than htonl() when encoding to XDR. (*) afs_deliver_yfsvl_get_endpoints() is using htonl() rather than ntohl() when decoding from XDR. Signed-off-by: David Howells --- fs/afs/cell.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/afs/cell.c') diff --git a/fs/afs/cell.c b/fs/afs/cell.c index 4235a05afc76..69b95faacc5e 100644 --- a/fs/afs/cell.c +++ b/fs/afs/cell.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ #include #include "internal.h" -unsigned __read_mostly afs_cell_gc_delay = 10; +static unsigned __read_mostly afs_cell_gc_delay = 10; static void afs_manage_cell(struct work_struct *); @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct afs_cell *afs_lookup_cell_rcu(struct afs_net *net, cell = rcu_dereference_raw(net->ws_cell); if (cell) { afs_get_cell(cell); - continue; + break; } ret = -EDESTADDRREQ; continue; @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static void afs_cell_destroy(struct rcu_head *rcu) ASSERTCMP(atomic_read(&cell->usage), ==, 0); - afs_put_addrlist(cell->vl_addrs); + afs_put_addrlist(rcu_access_pointer(cell->vl_addrs)); key_put(cell->anonymous_key); kfree(cell); -- cgit v1.2.3