From 838fe1887765f4cc679febea60d87d2a06bd300e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Kosina Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:28:54 +0100 Subject: btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by 80ad623edd2d ("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()"), it's perfectly valid / legal for cleaner_kthread() to stay scheduled out in an arbitrary place during suspend (in that particular example that was waiting for reading of extent pages), so there is no need to leave any traces of freezer in this kthread. Fixes: 80ad623edd2d ("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()") Fixes: 696249132158 ("btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()") Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 8579b35bb160..ff36a33ee9ca 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -1838,7 +1838,7 @@ static int cleaner_kthread(void *arg) */ btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(root->fs_info); sleep: - if (!try_to_freeze() && !again) { + if (!again) { set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); if (!kthread_should_stop()) schedule(); -- cgit v1.2.3