From 7270d11c56f594af4d166b2988421cd8ed933dc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:11:52 +0100 Subject: arm/bL_switcher: Kill tick suspend hackery Use the new tick_suspend/resume_local() and get rid of the homebrewn implementation of these in the ARM bL switcher. The check for the cpumask is completely pointless. There is no harm to suspend a per cpu tick device unconditionally. If that's a real issue then we fix it proper at the core level and not with some completely undocumented hacks in some random core code. Move the tick internals to the core code, now that this nuisance is gone. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ rjw: Rebase, changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Russell King Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1655112.Ws17YsMfN7@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index da796d65d1fb..e28ba5c044c5 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *cpup) * * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. */ -static void tick_suspend_local(void) +void tick_suspend_local(void) { struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); -- cgit v1.2.3