From 3e997130bd2e8c6f5aaa49d6e3161d4d29b43ab0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:50:42 -0400 Subject: timekeeping: Add missing update call in timekeeping_resume() The leap second rework unearthed another issue of inconsistent data. On timekeeping_resume() the timekeeper data is updated, but nothing calls timekeeping_update(), so now the update code in the timer interrupt sees stale values. This has been the case before those changes, but then the timer interrupt was using stale data as well so this went unnoticed for quite some time. Add the missing update call, so all the data is consistent everywhere. Reported-by: Andreas Schwab Reported-and-tested-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Steigerwald Cc: LKML Cc: Linux PM list Cc: John Stultz Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'kernel/time/timekeeping.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index 269b1fe5f2ae..3447cfaf11e7 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void) timekeeper.clock->cycle_last = timekeeper.clock->read(timekeeper.clock); timekeeper.ntp_error = 0; timekeeping_suspended = 0; + timekeeping_update(false); write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper.lock, flags); touch_softlockup_watchdog(); -- cgit v1.2.3