From c98a9805096460567404799a7bd3149826affde7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tal Shorer Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:27:50 +0200 Subject: workqueue: respect isolated cpus when queueing an unbound work Initialize wq_unbound_cpumask to exclude cpus that were isolated by the cmdline's isolcpus parameter. Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- kernel/workqueue.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 8fdb710bfdd7..6a5658cb46da 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "workqueue_internal.h" @@ -4957,6 +4958,10 @@ int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask) if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&saved_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM; + /* + * Not excluding isolated cpus on purpose. + * If the user wishes to include them, we allow that. + */ cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) { apply_wqattrs_lock(); @@ -5555,7 +5560,7 @@ int __init workqueue_init_early(void) WARN_ON(__alignof__(struct pool_workqueue) < __alignof__(long long)); BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&wq_unbound_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)); - cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); + cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN)); pwq_cache = KMEM_CACHE(pool_workqueue, SLAB_PANIC); -- cgit v1.2.3