From d656fe49e33df48ee6bc19e871f5862f49895c9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wenwen Wang Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:31:13 -0500 Subject: ethtool: fix a potential missing-check bug In ethtool_get_rxnfc(), the object "info" is firstly copied from user-space. If the FLOW_RSS flag is set in the member field flow_type of "info" (and cmd is ETHTOOL_GRXFH), info needs to be copied again from user-space because FLOW_RSS is newer and has new definition, as mentioned in the comment. However, given that the user data resides in user-space, a malicious user can race to change the data after the first copy. By doing so, the user can inject inconsistent data. For example, in the second copy, the FLOW_RSS flag could be cleared in the field flow_type of "info". In the following execution, "info" will be used in the function ops->get_rxnfc(). Such inconsistent data can potentially lead to unexpected information leakage since ops->get_rxnfc() will prepare various types of data according to flow_type, and the prepared data will be eventually copied to user-space. This inconsistent data may also cause undefined behaviors based on how ops->get_rxnfc() is implemented. This patch simply re-verifies the flow_type field of "info" after the second copy. If the value is not as expected, an error code will be returned. Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/ethtool.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'net/core') diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c index 03416e6dd5d7..ba02f0dfe85c 100644 --- a/net/core/ethtool.c +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c @@ -1032,6 +1032,11 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, info_size = sizeof(info); if (copy_from_user(&info, useraddr, info_size)) return -EFAULT; + /* Since malicious users may modify the original data, + * we need to check whether FLOW_RSS is still requested. + */ + if (!(info.flow_type & FLOW_RSS)) + return -EINVAL; } if (info.cmd == ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL) { -- cgit v1.2.3