From f8c0d226fef05226ff1a85055c8ed663022f40c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:11:21 -0400 Subject: svcrpc: simplify svc_close_all There's no need to be fooling with XPT_BUSY now that all the threads are gone. The list_del_init() here could execute at the same time as the svc_xprt_enqueue()'s list_add_tail(), with undefined results. We don't really care at this point, but it might result in a spurious list-corruption warning or something. And svc_close() isn't adding any value; just call svc_delete_xprt() directly. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'net') diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c index dd61cd02461f..8c018df80692 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -941,16 +941,16 @@ void svc_close_all(struct list_head *xprt_list) struct svc_xprt *xprt; struct svc_xprt *tmp; + /* + * The server is shutting down, and no more threads are running. + * svc_xprt_enqueue() might still be running, but at worst it + * will re-add the xprt to sp_sockets, which will soon get + * freed. So we don't bother with any more locking, and don't + * leave the close to the (nonexistent) server threads: + */ list_for_each_entry_safe(xprt, tmp, xprt_list, xpt_list) { set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags); - if (test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags)) { - /* Waiting to be processed, but no threads left, - * So just remove it from the waiting list - */ - list_del_init(&xprt->xpt_ready); - clear_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags); - } - svc_close_xprt(xprt); + svc_delete_xprt(xprt); } } -- cgit v1.2.3