From 53cea34b0a0a03568e189f8dfe2eb06f938986c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Ellerman Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:03:39 +1100 Subject: powerpc/secvar: Use u64 in secvar_operations There's no reason for secvar_operations to use uint64_t vs the more common kernel type u64. The types are compatible, but they require different printk format strings which can lead to confusion. Change all the secvar related routines to use u64. Reviewed-by: Russell Currey Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230210080401.345462-5-ajd@linux.ibm.com --- security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'security/integrity') diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c b/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c index a2900cb85357..1e4f80a4e71c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c +++ b/security/integrity/platform_certs/load_powerpc.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ /* * Get a certificate list blob from the named secure variable. */ -static __init void *get_cert_list(u8 *key, unsigned long keylen, uint64_t *size) +static __init void *get_cert_list(u8 *key, unsigned long keylen, u64 *size) { int rc; void *db; @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static __init void *get_cert_list(u8 *key, unsigned long keylen, uint64_t *size) static int __init load_powerpc_certs(void) { void *db = NULL, *dbx = NULL; - uint64_t dbsize = 0, dbxsize = 0; + u64 dbsize = 0, dbxsize = 0; int rc = 0; struct device_node *node; -- cgit v1.2.3