diff options
author | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> | 2020-12-03 21:07:06 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2020-12-09 09:37:43 +0100 |
commit | e45cdc71d1fa5ac3a57b23acc31eb959e4f60135 (patch) | |
tree | a49ce2b7a17945b7c43cb9d5e34d881bcd5d4735 | |
parent | 758c9373d84168dc7d039cf85a0e920046b17b41 (diff) | |
download | linux-e45cdc71d1fa5ac3a57b23acc31eb959e4f60135.tar.gz linux-e45cdc71d1fa5ac3a57b23acc31eb959e4f60135.tar.bz2 linux-e45cdc71d1fa5ac3a57b23acc31eb959e4f60135.zip |
membarrier: Execute SYNC_CORE on the calling thread
membarrier()'s MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE is documented as
syncing the core on all sibling threads but not necessarily the calling
thread. This behavior is fundamentally buggy and cannot be used safely.
Suppose a user program has two threads. Thread A is on CPU 0 and thread B
is on CPU 1. Thread A modifies some text and calls
membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE).
Then thread B executes the modified code. If, at any point after
membarrier() decides which CPUs to target, thread A could be preempted and
replaced by thread B on CPU 0. This could even happen on exit from the
membarrier() syscall. If this happens, thread B will end up running on CPU
0 without having synced.
In principle, this could be fixed by arranging for the scheduler to issue
sync_core_before_usermode() whenever switching between two threads in the
same mm if there is any possibility of a concurrent membarrier() call, but
this would have considerable overhead. Instead, make membarrier() sync the
calling CPU as well.
As an optimization, this avoids an extra smp_mb() in the default
barrier-only mode and an extra rseq preempt on the caller.
Fixes: 70216e18e519 ("membarrier: Provide core serializing command, *_SYNC_CORE")
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/250ded637696d490c69bef1877148db86066881c.1607058304.git.luto@kernel.org
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/membarrier.c | 51 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c index 1c278dff4f2d..9d8df34bea75 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c +++ b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c @@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id) return -EPERM; } - if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 || num_online_cpus() == 1) + if (flags != MEMBARRIER_FLAG_SYNC_CORE && + (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 || num_online_cpus() == 1)) return 0; /* @@ -213,8 +214,6 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id) if (cpu_id >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu_id)) goto out; - if (cpu_id == raw_smp_processor_id()) - goto out; rcu_read_lock(); p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu_id)->curr); if (!p || p->mm != mm) { @@ -229,16 +228,6 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id) for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { struct task_struct *p; - /* - * Skipping the current CPU is OK even through we can be - * migrated at any point. The current CPU, at the point - * where we read raw_smp_processor_id(), is ensured to - * be in program order with respect to the caller - * thread. Therefore, we can skip this CPU from the - * iteration. - */ - if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) - continue; p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr); if (p && p->mm == mm) __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmpmask); @@ -246,12 +235,38 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id) rcu_read_unlock(); } - preempt_disable(); - if (cpu_id >= 0) + if (cpu_id >= 0) { + /* + * smp_call_function_single() will call ipi_func() if cpu_id + * is the calling CPU. + */ smp_call_function_single(cpu_id, ipi_func, NULL, 1); - else - smp_call_function_many(tmpmask, ipi_func, NULL, 1); - preempt_enable(); + } else { + /* + * For regular membarrier, we can save a few cycles by + * skipping the current cpu -- we're about to do smp_mb() + * below, and if we migrate to a different cpu, this cpu + * and the new cpu will execute a full barrier in the + * scheduler. + * + * For SYNC_CORE, we do need a barrier on the current cpu -- + * otherwise, if we are migrated and replaced by a different + * task in the same mm just before, during, or after + * membarrier, we will end up with some thread in the mm + * running without a core sync. + * + * For RSEQ, don't rseq_preempt() the caller. User code + * is not supposed to issue syscalls at all from inside an + * rseq critical section. + */ + if (flags != MEMBARRIER_FLAG_SYNC_CORE) { + preempt_disable(); + smp_call_function_many(tmpmask, ipi_func, NULL, true); + preempt_enable(); + } else { + on_each_cpu_mask(tmpmask, ipi_func, NULL, true); + } + } out: if (cpu_id < 0) |