diff options
| author | Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> | 2018-05-11 16:01:50 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-05-11 17:28:45 -0700 |
| commit | 27227c733852f71008e9bf165950bb2edaed3a90 (patch) | |
| tree | b33e28b30d2ccc0c808720e31b3abd54183be5e6 | |
| parent | 6098d7e136692f9c6e23ae362c62ec822343e4d5 (diff) | |
| download | linux-27227c733852f71008e9bf165950bb2edaed3a90.tar.gz linux-27227c733852f71008e9bf165950bb2edaed3a90.tar.bz2 linux-27227c733852f71008e9bf165950bb2edaed3a90.zip | |
mm: sections are not offlined during memory hotremove
Memory hotplug and hotremove operate with per-block granularity. If the
machine has a large amount of memory (more than 64G), the size of a
memory block can span multiple sections. By mistake, during hotremove
we set only the first section to offline state.
The bug was discovered because kernel selftest started to fail:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180423011247.GK5563@yexl-desktop
After commit, "mm/memory_hotplug: optimize probe routine". But, the bug
is older than this commit. In this optimization we also added a check
for sections to be in a proper state during hotplug operation.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180427145257.15222-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
Fixes: 2d070eab2e82 ("mm: consider zone which is not fully populated to have holes")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/sparse.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c index 62eef264a7bd..73dc2fcc0eab 100644 --- a/mm/sparse.c +++ b/mm/sparse.c @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) unsigned long pfn; for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) { - unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(start_pfn); + unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn); struct mem_section *ms; /* |