summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>2013-06-18 09:20:50 +0100
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>2013-06-24 14:25:41 +0100
commit8182a34d85698d2fb696bfdafa21140916fd5d47 (patch)
tree1b9aae3eb01a1a827d9568942f3040a9373ae6d5
parent9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d (diff)
downloadlinux-8182a34d85698d2fb696bfdafa21140916fd5d47.tar.gz
linux-8182a34d85698d2fb696bfdafa21140916fd5d47.tar.bz2
linux-8182a34d85698d2fb696bfdafa21140916fd5d47.zip
ARM: 7760/1: cpu_fa526_do_idle: remove WFI
As it was already suggested by Russell King and Arnd Bergmann: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/16/133 moxart and gemini seem to be the only platforms using CPU_FA526, and instead of pointing arm_pm_idle to an empty function from platform code, it makes sense to remove WFI code from the processor specific idle function. Applies to arm-soc/for-next (and 3.10-rc1). Changes since v1: 1. remove WFI but make sure cpu_fa526_do_idle do not fall through to cpu_fa526_dcache_clean_area Note: moxart boots and prints to UART without this patch, but input is broken. Signed-off-by: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/mm/proc-fa526.S1
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-fa526.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-fa526.S
index d217e9795d74..aaeb6c127c7a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-fa526.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-fa526.S
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_fa526_reset)
*/
.align 4
ENTRY(cpu_fa526_do_idle)
- mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c0, 4 @ Wait for interrupt
mov pc, lr