summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2013-10-03 20:28:54 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2013-10-16 00:50:31 +0200
commitcb8bd497a61adea2ccb937e3181408fb95c78b52 (patch)
tree7955eebd58a4ce7b9f17a3b321a288d42575c6c4
parent6b67ca322d409003c29e119f8c8beeecd5785e20 (diff)
downloadlinux-cb8bd497a61adea2ccb937e3181408fb95c78b52.tar.gz
linux-cb8bd497a61adea2ccb937e3181408fb95c78b52.tar.bz2
linux-cb8bd497a61adea2ccb937e3181408fb95c78b52.zip
cpufreq: pmac: don't initialize part of policy set by core
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c1
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c1
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
index 8715ab99d80e..672b7f4a7de5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
@@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return -ENODEV;
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency;
- policy->cur = cur_freq;
return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, pmac_cpu_freqs);
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
index e853b852b34b..79e40c91378e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
@@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ static unsigned int g5_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
static int g5_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency;
- policy->cur = g5_cpu_freqs[g5_query_freq()].frequency;
/* secondary CPUs are tied to the primary one by the
* cpufreq core if in the secondary policy we tell it that
* it actually must be one policy together with all others. */