diff options
| author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> | 2017-03-24 15:57:33 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-03-24 20:51:28 -0700 |
| commit | b1977682a3858b5584ffea7cfb7bd863f68db18d (patch) | |
| tree | f255d32b2a4e2b72811b36bbd04b27ef9fd2a947 | |
| parent | 43a6684519ab0a6c52024b5e25322476cabad893 (diff) | |
| download | linux-b1977682a3858b5584ffea7cfb7bd863f68db18d.tar.gz linux-b1977682a3858b5584ffea7cfb7bd863f68db18d.tar.bz2 linux-b1977682a3858b5584ffea7cfb7bd863f68db18d.zip | |
bpf: improve verifier packet range checks
llvm can optimize the 'if (ptr > data_end)' checks to be in the order
slightly different than the original C code which will confuse verifier.
Like:
if (ptr + 16 > data_end)
return TC_ACT_SHOT;
// may be followed by
if (ptr + 14 > data_end)
return TC_ACT_SHOT;
while llvm can see that 'ptr' is valid for all 16 bytes,
the verifier could not.
Fix verifier logic to account for such case and add a test.
Reported-by: Huapeng Zhou <hzhou@fb.com>
Fixes: 969bf05eb3ce ("bpf: direct packet access")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 20 |
2 files changed, 23 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 796b68d00119..5e6202e62265 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1973,14 +1973,15 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id) - regs[i].range = dst_reg->off; + /* keep the maximum range already checked */ + regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, dst_reg->off); for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) continue; reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->id == dst_reg->id) - reg->range = dst_reg->off; + reg->range = max(reg->range, dst_reg->off); } } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index d1555e4240c0..7d761d4cc759 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -3418,6 +3418,26 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, }, { + "overlapping checks for direct packet access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, + }, + { "invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_IN", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, |