diff options
author | guodeqing <geffrey.guo@huawei.com> | 2020-07-16 16:12:08 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> | 2020-07-22 01:21:34 +0200 |
commit | 8210e344ccb798c672ab237b1a4f241bda08909b (patch) | |
tree | 26b904986060703f6c31bfd0538e24f222e3cd2c | |
parent | 1e9451cbda456a170518b2bfd643e2cb980880bf (diff) | |
download | linux-8210e344ccb798c672ab237b1a4f241bda08909b.tar.gz linux-8210e344ccb798c672ab237b1a4f241bda08909b.tar.bz2 linux-8210e344ccb798c672ab237b1a4f241bda08909b.zip |
ipvs: fix the connection sync failed in some cases
The sync_thread_backup only checks sk_receive_queue is empty or not,
there is a situation which cannot sync the connection entries when
sk_receive_queue is empty and sk_rmem_alloc is larger than sk_rcvbuf,
the sync packets are dropped in __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb, this is
because the packets in reader_queue is not read, so the rmem is
not reclaimed.
Here I add the check of whether the reader_queue of the udp sock is
empty or not to solve this problem.
Fixes: 2276f58ac589 ("udp: use a separate rx queue for packet reception")
Reported-by: zhouxudong <zhouxudong8@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: guodeqing <geffrey.guo@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
-rw-r--r-- | net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c index 605e0f68f8bd..2b8abbfe018c 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c @@ -1717,6 +1717,8 @@ static int sync_thread_backup(void *data) { struct ip_vs_sync_thread_data *tinfo = data; struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = tinfo->ipvs; + struct sock *sk = tinfo->sock->sk; + struct udp_sock *up = udp_sk(sk); int len; pr_info("sync thread started: state = BACKUP, mcast_ifn = %s, " @@ -1724,12 +1726,14 @@ static int sync_thread_backup(void *data) ipvs->bcfg.mcast_ifn, ipvs->bcfg.syncid, tinfo->id); while (!kthread_should_stop()) { - wait_event_interruptible(*sk_sleep(tinfo->sock->sk), - !skb_queue_empty(&tinfo->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue) - || kthread_should_stop()); + wait_event_interruptible(*sk_sleep(sk), + !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) || + !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&up->reader_queue) || + kthread_should_stop()); /* do we have data now? */ - while (!skb_queue_empty(&(tinfo->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))) { + while (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) || + !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&up->reader_queue)) { len = ip_vs_receive(tinfo->sock, tinfo->buf, ipvs->bcfg.sync_maxlen); if (len <= 0) { |