diff options
author | Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@thinrope.net> | 2006-04-01 01:41:22 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> | 2006-04-01 01:41:22 +0200 |
commit | 8ba8e95ed14a2771bbcb43300feda094f298853e (patch) | |
tree | 8f487c4f31175eea531fbf7305c91819eca17bec /COPYING | |
parent | 36a891b67f95fd5e1442fc0f7f953809b94b3fbc (diff) | |
download | linux-8ba8e95ed14a2771bbcb43300feda094f298853e.tar.gz linux-8ba8e95ed14a2771bbcb43300feda094f298853e.tar.bz2 linux-8ba8e95ed14a2771bbcb43300feda094f298853e.zip |
Fix comments: s/granuality/granularity/
I was grepping through the code and some `grep ganularity -R .` didn't
catch what I thought. Then looking closer I saw the term "granuality"
used in only four places (in comments) and granularity in many more
places describing the same idea. Some other facts:
dictionary.com does not know such a word
define:granuality on google is not found (and pages for granuality are
mostly related to patches to the kernel)
it has not been discussed as a term on LKML, AFAICS (=Can Search)
To be consistent, I think granularity should be used everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@thinrope.net>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'COPYING')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions