diff options
author | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> | 2019-06-12 14:53:03 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 2019-06-14 14:32:18 -0600 |
commit | d6a3b247627a3bc0551504eb305d624cc6fb5453 (patch) | |
tree | d2605772889c71e02d4aeda5a616567153d68b6a /Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt | |
parent | d223884089734cc637c4e5458870d69f6ded9f89 (diff) | |
download | linux-d6a3b247627a3bc0551504eb305d624cc6fb5453.tar.gz linux-d6a3b247627a3bc0551504eb305d624cc6fb5453.tar.bz2 linux-d6a3b247627a3bc0551504eb305d624cc6fb5453.zip |
docs: scheduler: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst
In order to prepare to add them to the Kernel API book,
convert the files to ReST format.
The conversion is actually:
- add blank lines and identation in order to identify paragraphs;
- fix tables markups;
- add some lists markups;
- mark literal blocks;
- adjust title markups.
At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to
the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt | 242 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 242 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt deleted file mode 100644 index edd861c94c1b..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,242 +0,0 @@ - ============= - CFS Scheduler - ============= - - -1. OVERVIEW - -CFS stands for "Completely Fair Scheduler," and is the new "desktop" process -scheduler implemented by Ingo Molnar and merged in Linux 2.6.23. It is the -replacement for the previous vanilla scheduler's SCHED_OTHER interactivity -code. - -80% of CFS's design can be summed up in a single sentence: CFS basically models -an "ideal, precise multi-tasking CPU" on real hardware. - -"Ideal multi-tasking CPU" is a (non-existent :-)) CPU that has 100% physical -power and which can run each task at precise equal speed, in parallel, each at -1/nr_running speed. For example: if there are 2 tasks running, then it runs -each at 50% physical power --- i.e., actually in parallel. - -On real hardware, we can run only a single task at once, so we have to -introduce the concept of "virtual runtime." The virtual runtime of a task -specifies when its next timeslice would start execution on the ideal -multi-tasking CPU described above. In practice, the virtual runtime of a task -is its actual runtime normalized to the total number of running tasks. - - - -2. FEW IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS - -In CFS the virtual runtime is expressed and tracked via the per-task -p->se.vruntime (nanosec-unit) value. This way, it's possible to accurately -timestamp and measure the "expected CPU time" a task should have gotten. - -[ small detail: on "ideal" hardware, at any time all tasks would have the same - p->se.vruntime value --- i.e., tasks would execute simultaneously and no task - would ever get "out of balance" from the "ideal" share of CPU time. ] - -CFS's task picking logic is based on this p->se.vruntime value and it is thus -very simple: it always tries to run the task with the smallest p->se.vruntime -value (i.e., the task which executed least so far). CFS always tries to split -up CPU time between runnable tasks as close to "ideal multitasking hardware" as -possible. - -Most of the rest of CFS's design just falls out of this really simple concept, -with a few add-on embellishments like nice levels, multiprocessing and various -algorithm variants to recognize sleepers. - - - -3. THE RBTREE - -CFS's design is quite radical: it does not use the old data structures for the -runqueues, but it uses a time-ordered rbtree to build a "timeline" of future -task execution, and thus has no "array switch" artifacts (by which both the -previous vanilla scheduler and RSDL/SD are affected). - -CFS also maintains the rq->cfs.min_vruntime value, which is a monotonic -increasing value tracking the smallest vruntime among all tasks in the -runqueue. The total amount of work done by the system is tracked using -min_vruntime; that value is used to place newly activated entities on the left -side of the tree as much as possible. - -The total number of running tasks in the runqueue is accounted through the -rq->cfs.load value, which is the sum of the weights of the tasks queued on the -runqueue. - -CFS maintains a time-ordered rbtree, where all runnable tasks are sorted by the -p->se.vruntime key. CFS picks the "leftmost" task from this tree and sticks to it. -As the system progresses forwards, the executed tasks are put into the tree -more and more to the right --- slowly but surely giving a chance for every task -to become the "leftmost task" and thus get on the CPU within a deterministic -amount of time. - -Summing up, CFS works like this: it runs a task a bit, and when the task -schedules (or a scheduler tick happens) the task's CPU usage is "accounted -for": the (small) time it just spent using the physical CPU is added to -p->se.vruntime. Once p->se.vruntime gets high enough so that another task -becomes the "leftmost task" of the time-ordered rbtree it maintains (plus a -small amount of "granularity" distance relative to the leftmost task so that we -do not over-schedule tasks and trash the cache), then the new leftmost task is -picked and the current task is preempted. - - - -4. SOME FEATURES OF CFS - -CFS uses nanosecond granularity accounting and does not rely on any jiffies or -other HZ detail. Thus the CFS scheduler has no notion of "timeslices" in the -way the previous scheduler had, and has no heuristics whatsoever. There is -only one central tunable (you have to switch on CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG): - - /proc/sys/kernel/sched_min_granularity_ns - -which can be used to tune the scheduler from "desktop" (i.e., low latencies) to -"server" (i.e., good batching) workloads. It defaults to a setting suitable -for desktop workloads. SCHED_BATCH is handled by the CFS scheduler module too. - -Due to its design, the CFS scheduler is not prone to any of the "attacks" that -exist today against the heuristics of the stock scheduler: fiftyp.c, thud.c, -chew.c, ring-test.c, massive_intr.c all work fine and do not impact -interactivity and produce the expected behavior. - -The CFS scheduler has a much stronger handling of nice levels and SCHED_BATCH -than the previous vanilla scheduler: both types of workloads are isolated much -more aggressively. - -SMP load-balancing has been reworked/sanitized: the runqueue-walking -assumptions are gone from the load-balancing code now, and iterators of the -scheduling modules are used. The balancing code got quite a bit simpler as a -result. - - - -5. Scheduling policies - -CFS implements three scheduling policies: - - - SCHED_NORMAL (traditionally called SCHED_OTHER): The scheduling - policy that is used for regular tasks. - - - SCHED_BATCH: Does not preempt nearly as often as regular tasks - would, thereby allowing tasks to run longer and make better use of - caches but at the cost of interactivity. This is well suited for - batch jobs. - - - SCHED_IDLE: This is even weaker than nice 19, but its not a true - idle timer scheduler in order to avoid to get into priority - inversion problems which would deadlock the machine. - -SCHED_FIFO/_RR are implemented in sched/rt.c and are as specified by -POSIX. - -The command chrt from util-linux-ng 2.13.1.1 can set all of these except -SCHED_IDLE. - - - -6. SCHEDULING CLASSES - -The new CFS scheduler has been designed in such a way to introduce "Scheduling -Classes," an extensible hierarchy of scheduler modules. These modules -encapsulate scheduling policy details and are handled by the scheduler core -without the core code assuming too much about them. - -sched/fair.c implements the CFS scheduler described above. - -sched/rt.c implements SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR semantics, in a simpler way than -the previous vanilla scheduler did. It uses 100 runqueues (for all 100 RT -priority levels, instead of 140 in the previous scheduler) and it needs no -expired array. - -Scheduling classes are implemented through the sched_class structure, which -contains hooks to functions that must be called whenever an interesting event -occurs. - -This is the (partial) list of the hooks: - - - enqueue_task(...) - - Called when a task enters a runnable state. - It puts the scheduling entity (task) into the red-black tree and - increments the nr_running variable. - - - dequeue_task(...) - - When a task is no longer runnable, this function is called to keep the - corresponding scheduling entity out of the red-black tree. It decrements - the nr_running variable. - - - yield_task(...) - - This function is basically just a dequeue followed by an enqueue, unless the - compat_yield sysctl is turned on; in that case, it places the scheduling - entity at the right-most end of the red-black tree. - - - check_preempt_curr(...) - - This function checks if a task that entered the runnable state should - preempt the currently running task. - - - pick_next_task(...) - - This function chooses the most appropriate task eligible to run next. - - - set_curr_task(...) - - This function is called when a task changes its scheduling class or changes - its task group. - - - task_tick(...) - - This function is mostly called from time tick functions; it might lead to - process switch. This drives the running preemption. - - - - -7. GROUP SCHEDULER EXTENSIONS TO CFS - -Normally, the scheduler operates on individual tasks and strives to provide -fair CPU time to each task. Sometimes, it may be desirable to group tasks and -provide fair CPU time to each such task group. For example, it may be -desirable to first provide fair CPU time to each user on the system and then to -each task belonging to a user. - -CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED strives to achieve exactly that. It lets tasks to be -grouped and divides CPU time fairly among such groups. - -CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED permits to group real-time (i.e., SCHED_FIFO and -SCHED_RR) tasks. - -CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED permits to group CFS (i.e., SCHED_NORMAL and -SCHED_BATCH) tasks. - - These options need CONFIG_CGROUPS to be defined, and let the administrator - create arbitrary groups of tasks, using the "cgroup" pseudo filesystem. See - Documentation/cgroup-v1/cgroups.txt for more information about this filesystem. - -When CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is defined, a "cpu.shares" file is created for each -group created using the pseudo filesystem. See example steps below to create -task groups and modify their CPU share using the "cgroups" pseudo filesystem. - - # mount -t tmpfs cgroup_root /sys/fs/cgroup - # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu - # mount -t cgroup -ocpu none /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu - # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu - - # mkdir multimedia # create "multimedia" group of tasks - # mkdir browser # create "browser" group of tasks - - # #Configure the multimedia group to receive twice the CPU bandwidth - # #that of browser group - - # echo 2048 > multimedia/cpu.shares - # echo 1024 > browser/cpu.shares - - # firefox & # Launch firefox and move it to "browser" group - # echo <firefox_pid> > browser/tasks - - # #Launch gmplayer (or your favourite movie player) - # echo <movie_player_pid> > multimedia/tasks |