diff options
author | Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> | 2007-05-04 11:52:20 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 2007-07-12 16:29:47 -0700 |
commit | 0458d5b4c9cc4ca0f62625d0144ddc4b4bc97a3c (patch) | |
tree | 8b1fcb4f063ef4aa6f2e3cd41a60d986a1e432d4 /Documentation/usb | |
parent | ce7cd137fced114d49178b73d468b82096a107fb (diff) | |
download | linux-0458d5b4c9cc4ca0f62625d0144ddc4b4bc97a3c.tar.gz linux-0458d5b4c9cc4ca0f62625d0144ddc4b4bc97a3c.tar.bz2 linux-0458d5b4c9cc4ca0f62625d0144ddc4b4bc97a3c.zip |
USB: add USB-Persist facility
This patch (as886) adds the controversial USB-persist facility,
allowing USB devices to persist across a power loss during system
suspend.
The facility is controlled by a new Kconfig option (with appropriate
warnings about the potential dangers); when the option is off the
behavior will remain the same as it is now. But when the option is
on, people will be able to use suspend-to-disk and keep their USB
filesystems intact -- something particularly valuable for small
machines where the root filesystem is on a USB device!
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/usb')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/usb/persist.txt | 144 |
1 files changed, 144 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/usb/persist.txt b/Documentation/usb/persist.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6dcd5f884795 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/usb/persist.txt @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ + USB device persistence during system suspend + + Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> + + September 2, 2006 (Updated March 27, 2007) + + + What is the problem? + +According to the USB specification, when a USB bus is suspended the +bus must continue to supply suspend current (around 1-5 mA). This +is so that devices can maintain their internal state and hubs can +detect connect-change events (devices being plugged in or unplugged). +The technical term is "power session". + +If a USB device's power session is interrupted then the system is +required to behave as though the device has been unplugged. It's a +conservative approach; in the absence of suspend current the computer +has no way to know what has actually happened. Perhaps the same +device is still attached or perhaps it was removed and a different +device plugged into the port. The system must assume the worst. + +By default, Linux behaves according to the spec. If a USB host +controller loses power during a system suspend, then when the system +wakes up all the devices attached to that controller are treated as +though they had disconnected. This is always safe and it is the +"officially correct" thing to do. + +For many sorts of devices this behavior doesn't matter in the least. +If the kernel wants to believe that your USB keyboard was unplugged +while the system was asleep and a new keyboard was plugged in when the +system woke up, who cares? It'll still work the same when you type on +it. + +Unfortunately problems _can_ arise, particularly with mass-storage +devices. The effect is exactly the same as if the device really had +been unplugged while the system was suspended. If you had a mounted +filesystem on the device, you're out of luck -- everything in that +filesystem is now inaccessible. This is especially annoying if your +root filesystem was located on the device, since your system will +instantly crash. + +Loss of power isn't the only mechanism to worry about. Anything that +interrupts a power session will have the same effect. For example, +even though suspend current may have been maintained while the system +was asleep, on many systems during the initial stages of wakeup the +firmware (i.e., the BIOS) resets the motherboard's USB host +controllers. Result: all the power sessions are destroyed and again +it's as though you had unplugged all the USB devices. Yes, it's +entirely the BIOS's fault, but that doesn't do _you_ any good unless +you can convince the BIOS supplier to fix the problem (lots of luck!). + +On many systems the USB host controllers will get reset after a +suspend-to-RAM. On almost all systems, no suspend current is +available during suspend-to-disk (also known as swsusp). You can +check the kernel log after resuming to see if either of these has +happened; look for lines saying "root hub lost power or was reset". + +In practice, people are forced to unmount any filesystems on a USB +device before suspending. If the root filesystem is on a USB device, +the system can't be suspended at all. (All right, it _can_ be +suspended -- but it will crash as soon as it wakes up, which isn't +much better.) + + + What is the solution? + +Setting CONFIG_USB_PERSIST will cause the kernel to work around these +issues. It enables a mode in which the core USB device data +structures are allowed to persist across a power-session disruption. +It works like this. If the kernel sees that a USB host controller is +not in the expected state during resume (i.e., if the controller was +reset or otherwise had lost power) then it applies a persistence check +to each of the USB devices below that controller. It doesn't try to +resume the device; that can't work once the power session is gone. +Instead it issues a USB port reset and then re-enumerates the device. +(This is exactly the same thing that happens whenever a USB device is +reset.) If the re-enumeration shows that the device now attached to +that port has the same descriptors as before, including the Vendor and +Product IDs, then the kernel continues to use the same device +structure. In effect, the kernel treats the device as though it had +merely been reset instead of unplugged. + +If no device is now attached to the port, or if the descriptors are +different from what the kernel remembers, then the treatment is what +you would expect. The kernel destroys the old device structure and +behaves as though the old device had been unplugged and a new device +plugged in, just as it would without the CONFIG_USB_PERSIST option. + +The end result is that the USB device remains available and usable. +Filesystem mounts and memory mappings are unaffected, and the world is +now a good and happy place. + + + Is this the best solution? + +Perhaps not. Arguably, keeping track of mounted filesystems and +memory mappings across device disconnects should be handled by a +centralized Logical Volume Manager. Such a solution would allow you +to plug in a USB flash device, create a persistent volume associated +with it, unplug the flash device, plug it back in later, and still +have the same persistent volume associated with the device. As such +it would be more far-reaching than CONFIG_USB_PERSIST. + +On the other hand, writing a persistent volume manager would be a big +job and using it would require significant input from the user. This +solution is much quicker and easier -- and it exists now, a giant +point in its favor! + +Furthermore, the USB_PERSIST option applies to _all_ USB devices, not +just mass-storage devices. It might turn out to be equally useful for +other device types, such as network interfaces. + + + WARNING: Using CONFIG_USB_PERSIST can be dangerous!! + +When recovering an interrupted power session the kernel does its best +to make sure the USB device hasn't been changed; that is, the same +device is still plugged into the port as before. But the checks +aren't guaranteed to be 100% accurate. + +If you replace one USB device with another of the same type (same +manufacturer, same IDs, and so on) there's an excellent chance the +kernel won't detect the change. Serial numbers and other strings are +not compared. In many cases it wouldn't help if they were, because +manufacturers frequently omit serial numbers entirely in their +devices. + +Furthermore it's quite possible to leave a USB device exactly the same +while changing its media. If you replace the flash memory card in a +USB card reader while the system is asleep, the kernel will have no +way to know you did it. The kernel will assume that nothing has +happened and will continue to use the partition tables, inodes, and +memory mappings for the old card. + +If the kernel gets fooled in this way, it's almost certain to cause +data corruption and to crash your system. You'll have no one to blame +but yourself. + +YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! + +That having been said, most of the time there shouldn't be any trouble +at all. The "persist" feature can be extremely useful. Make the most +of it. |