diff options
author | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> | 2017-07-07 09:19:42 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2017-07-08 10:29:48 +0200 |
commit | 4855022a52262411ce38c93dec4cb1470705c0a0 (patch) | |
tree | dbeb97d79e64df1492aae5b792c2b27139f696db /MAINTAINERS | |
parent | 4422d80ed7d4bdb2d6e9fb890c66c3d9250ba694 (diff) | |
download | linux-4855022a52262411ce38c93dec4cb1470705c0a0.tar.gz linux-4855022a52262411ce38c93dec4cb1470705c0a0.tar.bz2 linux-4855022a52262411ce38c93dec4cb1470705c0a0.zip |
objtool: Fix sibling call detection logic
With some configs, objtool reports the following warning:
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.o: warning: objtool: ftrace_modify_code_direct()+0x2d: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
The instruction it's complaining about isn't actually a sibling call.
It's just a normal jump to an address inside the function. Objtool
thought it was a sibling call because the instruction's jump_dest wasn't
initialized because the function was supposed to be ignored due to its
use of sync_core().
Objtool ended up validating the function instead of ignoring it because
it didn't properly recognize a sibling call to the function. So fix the
sibling call logic. Also add a warning to catch ignored functions being
validated so we'll get a more useful error message next time.
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/96cc8ecbcdd8cb29ddd783817b4af918a6a171b0.1499437107.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'MAINTAINERS')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions