diff options
author | Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-06-24 14:55:22 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-07-20 10:55:59 +0200 |
commit | 3f161e0ae863a0456d00e5a6c9c81098c62ab7fe (patch) | |
tree | d4c1e0aa6f634e733c75274da6c5c48cab8d46b6 /arch/s390/net | |
parent | 05a68e892e89c97df6650cd8cc55058002657cbc (diff) | |
download | linux-3f161e0ae863a0456d00e5a6c9c81098c62ab7fe.tar.gz linux-3f161e0ae863a0456d00e5a6c9c81098c62ab7fe.tar.bz2 linux-3f161e0ae863a0456d00e5a6c9c81098c62ab7fe.zip |
s390/bpf: implement BPF_PROBE_MEM
This is a s390 port of x86 commit 3dec541b2e63 ("bpf: Add support for BTF
pointers to x86 JIT").
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/net')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 139 |
1 files changed, 138 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index f4242b894cf2..8fe7bdfc8d15 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct bpf_jit { int r1_thunk_ip; /* Address of expoline thunk for 'br %r1' */ int r14_thunk_ip; /* Address of expoline thunk for 'br %r14' */ int tail_call_start; /* Tail call start offset */ + int excnt; /* Number of exception table entries */ int labels[1]; /* Labels for local jumps */ }; @@ -588,6 +589,84 @@ static void bpf_jit_epilogue(struct bpf_jit *jit, u32 stack_depth) } } +static int get_probe_mem_regno(const u8 *insn) +{ + /* + * insn must point to llgc, llgh, llgf or lg, which have destination + * register at the same position. + */ + if (insn[0] != 0xe3) /* common llgc, llgh, llgf and lg prefix */ + return -1; + if (insn[5] != 0x90 && /* llgc */ + insn[5] != 0x91 && /* llgh */ + insn[5] != 0x16 && /* llgf */ + insn[5] != 0x04) /* lg */ + return -1; + return insn[1] >> 4; +} + +static bool ex_handler_bpf(const struct exception_table_entry *x, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + int regno; + u8 *insn; + + regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(x); + insn = (u8 *)__rewind_psw(regs->psw, regs->int_code >> 16); + regno = get_probe_mem_regno(insn); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(regno < 0)) + /* JIT bug - unexpected instruction. */ + return false; + regs->gprs[regno] = 0; + return true; +} + +static int bpf_jit_probe_mem(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, + int probe_prg, int nop_prg) +{ + struct exception_table_entry *ex; + s64 delta; + u8 *insn; + int prg; + int i; + + if (!fp->aux->extable) + /* Do nothing during early JIT passes. */ + return 0; + insn = jit->prg_buf + probe_prg; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(get_probe_mem_regno(insn) < 0)) + /* JIT bug - unexpected probe instruction. */ + return -1; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(probe_prg + insn_length(*insn) != nop_prg)) + /* JIT bug - gap between probe and nop instructions. */ + return -1; + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jit->excnt >= fp->aux->num_exentries)) + /* Verifier bug - not enough entries. */ + return -1; + ex = &fp->aux->extable[jit->excnt]; + /* Add extable entries for probe and nop instructions. */ + prg = i == 0 ? probe_prg : nop_prg; + delta = jit->prg_buf + prg - (u8 *)&ex->insn; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(delta < INT_MIN || delta > INT_MAX)) + /* JIT bug - code and extable must be close. */ + return -1; + ex->insn = delta; + /* + * Always land on the nop. Note that extable infrastructure + * ignores fixup field, it is handled by ex_handler_bpf(). + */ + delta = jit->prg_buf + nop_prg - (u8 *)&ex->fixup; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(delta < INT_MIN || delta > INT_MAX)) + /* JIT bug - landing pad and extable must be close. */ + return -1; + ex->fixup = delta; + ex->handler = (u8 *)ex_handler_bpf - (u8 *)&ex->handler; + jit->excnt++; + } + return 0; +} + /* * Compile one eBPF instruction into s390x code * @@ -604,7 +683,14 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *addrs = jit->addrs; s32 imm = insn->imm; s16 off = insn->off; + int probe_prg = -1; unsigned int mask; + int nop_prg; + int err; + + if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_LDX && + BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) + probe_prg = jit->prg; switch (insn->code) { /* @@ -1119,6 +1205,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, * BPF_LDX */ case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B: /* dst = *(u8 *)(ul) (src + off) */ + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_B: /* llgc %dst,0(off,%src) */ EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0090, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off); jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM; @@ -1126,6 +1213,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, insn_count = 2; break; case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H: /* dst = *(u16 *)(ul) (src + off) */ + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_H: /* llgh %dst,0(off,%src) */ EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0091, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off); jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM; @@ -1133,6 +1221,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, insn_count = 2; break; case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W: /* dst = *(u32 *)(ul) (src + off) */ + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W: /* llgf %dst,off(%src) */ jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM; EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0016, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off); @@ -1140,6 +1229,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, insn_count = 2; break; case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */ + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW: /* lg %dst,0(off,%src) */ jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM; EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off); @@ -1485,6 +1575,23 @@ branch_oc: pr_err("Unknown opcode %02x\n", insn->code); return -1; } + + if (probe_prg != -1) { + /* + * Handlers of certain exceptions leave psw.addr pointing to + * the instruction directly after the failing one. Therefore, + * create two exception table entries and also add a nop in + * case two probing instructions come directly after each + * other. + */ + nop_prg = jit->prg; + /* bcr 0,%0 */ + _EMIT2(0x0700); + err = bpf_jit_probe_mem(jit, fp, probe_prg, nop_prg); + if (err < 0) + return err; + } + return insn_count; } @@ -1527,6 +1634,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_prog(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, jit->lit32 = jit->lit32_start; jit->lit64 = jit->lit64_start; jit->prg = 0; + jit->excnt = 0; bpf_jit_prologue(jit, stack_depth); if (bpf_set_addr(jit, 0) < 0) @@ -1551,6 +1659,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_prog(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, jit->lit64_start = ALIGN(jit->lit64_start, 8); jit->size = jit->lit64_start + lit64_size; jit->size_prg = jit->prg; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(fp->aux->extable && + jit->excnt != fp->aux->num_exentries)) + /* Verifier bug - too many entries. */ + return -1; + return 0; } @@ -1565,6 +1679,29 @@ struct s390_jit_data { int pass; }; +static struct bpf_binary_header *bpf_jit_alloc(struct bpf_jit *jit, + struct bpf_prog *fp) +{ + struct bpf_binary_header *header; + u32 extable_size; + u32 code_size; + + /* We need two entries per insn. */ + fp->aux->num_exentries *= 2; + + code_size = roundup(jit->size, + __alignof__(struct exception_table_entry)); + extable_size = fp->aux->num_exentries * + sizeof(struct exception_table_entry); + header = bpf_jit_binary_alloc(code_size + extable_size, &jit->prg_buf, + 8, jit_fill_hole); + if (!header) + return NULL; + fp->aux->extable = (struct exception_table_entry *) + (jit->prg_buf + code_size); + return header; +} + /* * Compile eBPF program "fp" */ @@ -1631,7 +1768,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) /* * Final pass: Allocate and generate program */ - header = bpf_jit_binary_alloc(jit.size, &jit.prg_buf, 8, jit_fill_hole); + header = bpf_jit_alloc(&jit, fp); if (!header) { fp = orig_fp; goto free_addrs; |