x86/entry/32: Introduce and use X86_BUG_ESPFIX instead of paravirt_enabled

x86_64 has very clean espfix handling on paravirt: espfix64 is set
up in native_iret, so paravirt systems that override iret bypass
espfix64 automatically.  This is robust and straightforward.

x86_32 is messier.  espfix is set up before the IRET paravirt patch
point, so it can't be directly conditionalized on whether we use
native_iret.  We also can't easily move it into native_iret without
regressing performance due to a bizarre consideration.  Specifically,
on 64-bit kernels, the logic is:

  if (regs->ss & 0x4)
          setup_espfix;

On 32-bit kernels, the logic is:

  if ((regs->ss & 0x4) && (regs->cs & 0x3) == 3 &&
      (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_VM) == 0)
          setup_espfix;

The performance of setup_espfix itself is essentially irrelevant, but
the comparison happens on every IRET so its performance matters.  On
x86_64, there's no need for any registers except flags to implement
the comparison, so we fold the whole thing into native_iret.  On
x86_32, we don't do that because we need a free register to
implement the comparison efficiently.  We therefore do espfix setup
before restoring registers on x86_32.

This patch gets rid of the explicit paravirt_enabled check by
introducing X86_BUG_ESPFIX on 32-bit systems and using an ALTERNATIVE
to skip espfix on paravirt systems where iret != native_iret.  This is
also messy, but it's at least in line with other things we do.

This improves espfix performance by removing a branch, but no one
cares.  More importantly, it removes a paravirt_enabled user, which is
good because paravirt_enabled is ill-defined and is going away.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: lguest@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 079d83fc6488..d8337f34b5f4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -803,6 +803,31 @@ static void detect_nopl(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 #else
 	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NOPL);
 #endif
+
+	/*
+	 * ESPFIX is a strange bug.  All real CPUs have it.  Paravirt
+	 * systems that run Linux at CPL > 0 may or may not have the
+	 * issue, but, even if they have the issue, there's absolutely
+	 * nothing we can do about it because we can't use the real IRET
+	 * instruction.
+	 *
+	 * NB: For the time being, only 32-bit kernels support
+	 * X86_BUG_ESPFIX as such.  64-bit kernels directly choose
+	 * whether to apply espfix using paravirt hooks.  If any
+	 * non-paravirt system ever shows up that does *not* have the
+	 * ESPFIX issue, we can change this.
+	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
+	do {
+		extern void native_iret(void);
+		if (pv_cpu_ops.iret == native_iret)
+			set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_ESPFIX);
+	} while (0);
+#else
+	set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_ESPFIX);
+#endif
+#endif
 }
 
 static void generic_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)