summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/xen/time.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>2008-06-12 10:47:56 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2008-06-12 10:47:56 +0200
commitf595ec964daf7f99668039d7303ddedd09a75142 (patch)
tree4ee6679105f0437995ff200f10885598921ae1cd /arch/x86/xen/time.c
parent5e70b7f3c24468bb1635b295945edb48ecd9656a (diff)
downloadlinux-f595ec964daf7f99668039d7303ddedd09a75142.tar.gz
linux-f595ec964daf7f99668039d7303ddedd09a75142.tar.bz2
linux-f595ec964daf7f99668039d7303ddedd09a75142.zip
common implementation of iterative div/mod
We have a few instances of the open-coded iterative div/mod loop, used when we don't expcet the dividend to be much bigger than the divisor. Unfortunately modern gcc's have the tendency to strength "reduce" this into a full mod operation, which isn't necessarily any faster, and even if it were, doesn't exist if gcc implements it in libgcc. The workaround is to put a dummy asm statement in the loop to prevent gcc from performing the transformation. This patch creates a single implementation of this loop, and uses it to replace the open-coded versions I know about. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/xen/time.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/xen/time.c13
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
index c39e1a5aa241..52b2e3856980 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <linux/clockchips.h>
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
#include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
@@ -150,11 +151,7 @@ static void do_stolen_accounting(void)
if (stolen < 0)
stolen = 0;
- ticks = 0;
- while (stolen >= NS_PER_TICK) {
- ticks++;
- stolen -= NS_PER_TICK;
- }
+ ticks = iter_div_u64_rem(stolen, NS_PER_TICK, &stolen);
__get_cpu_var(residual_stolen) = stolen;
account_steal_time(NULL, ticks);
@@ -166,11 +163,7 @@ static void do_stolen_accounting(void)
if (blocked < 0)
blocked = 0;
- ticks = 0;
- while (blocked >= NS_PER_TICK) {
- ticks++;
- blocked -= NS_PER_TICK;
- }
+ ticks = iter_div_u64_rem(blocked, NS_PER_TICK, &blocked);
__get_cpu_var(residual_blocked) = blocked;
account_steal_time(idle_task(smp_processor_id()), ticks);
}