diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2006-11-17 05:57:49 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org> | 2006-11-17 08:20:09 -0800 |
| commit | 0796bdb7e9e4a48b401f4fba1ee5dc79a45528ef (patch) | |
| tree | fe7a37931bc1f2ac79b61102d190277f9a1c039e /arch | |
| parent | 4be703906cffd5902028d20626e636ba21fb0b61 (diff) | |
| download | linux-0796bdb7e9e4a48b401f4fba1ee5dc79a45528ef.tar.gz linux-0796bdb7e9e4a48b401f4fba1ee5dc79a45528ef.tar.bz2 linux-0796bdb7e9e4a48b401f4fba1ee5dc79a45528ef.zip | |
[PATCH] x86_64: stack unwinder crash fix
the new dwarf2 unwinder crashes while trying to dump the stack:
Leftover inexact backtrace:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffff82800000 RIP:
[<ffffffff8026cf26>] dump_trace+0x35b/0x3d2
PGD 203027 PUD 205027 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [2] PREEMPT SMP
CPU 0
Modules linked in:
Pid: 30, comm: khelper Not tainted 2.6.19-rc6-rt1 #11
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8026cf26>] [<ffffffff8026cf26>] dump_trace+0x35b/0x3d2
RSP: 0000:ffff81003fb9d848 EFLAGS: 00010006
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff805b3520 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffffff827ffff9 R08: ffffffff80aad000 R09: 0000000000000005
R10: ffffffff80aae000 R11: ffffffff8037961b R12: ffff81003fb9d858
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff80598460 R15: ffffffff80ab1fc0
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff806c4200(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: ffffffff82800000 CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
this crash happened because it did not sanitize the dwarf2 data it
got, and got an unaligned stack pointer - which happily walked past
the process stack (and eventually reached the end of kernel memory
and pagefaulted there) due to this naive iteration condition:
HANDLE_STACK (((long) stack & (THREAD_SIZE-1)) != 0);
note that i386 is alot more conservative when it comes to trusting
stack pointers:
static inline int valid_stack_ptr(struct thread_info *tinfo, void *p)
{
return p > (void *)tinfo &&
p < (void *)tinfo + THREAD_SIZE - 3;
}
but the x86_64 code did not take this bit of i386 code.
The fix is to align the stack pointer.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c index 7819022a8db5..a153d0a01b72 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c @@ -290,6 +290,12 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long * s if (tsk && tsk != current) stack = (unsigned long *)tsk->thread.rsp; } + /* + * Align the stack pointer on word boundary, later loops + * rely on that (and corruption / debug info bugs can cause + * unaligned values here): + */ + stack = (unsigned long *)((unsigned long)stack & ~(sizeof(long)-1)); /* * Print function call entries within a stack. 'cond' is the |