diff options
| author | Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> | 2013-09-27 21:56:31 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2013-10-03 10:39:44 +0100 |
| commit | bc41b8724f24b9a27d1dcc6c974b8f686b38d554 (patch) | |
| tree | 3572fd34c6dd22e6b72c0a855ac8943921d419ad /arch | |
| parent | 856337283a215b9f92189f22862e4415f4d6bd85 (diff) | |
| download | linux-bc41b8724f24b9a27d1dcc6c974b8f686b38d554.tar.gz linux-bc41b8724f24b9a27d1dcc6c974b8f686b38d554.tar.bz2 linux-bc41b8724f24b9a27d1dcc6c974b8f686b38d554.zip | |
ARM: 7846/1: Update SMP_ON_UP code to detect A9MPCore with 1 CPU devices
The generic code is well equipped to differentiate between
SMP and UP configurations.However, there are some devices which
use Cortex-A9 MP core IP with 1 CPU as configuration. To let
these SOCs to co-exist in a CONFIG_SMP=y build by leveraging
the SMP_ON_UP support, we need to additionally check the
number the cores in Cortex-A9 MPCore configuration. Without
such a check in place, the startup code tries to execute
ALT_SMP() set of instructions which lead to CPU faults.
The issue was spotted on TI's Aegis device and this patch
makes now the device work with omap2plus_defconfig which
enables SMP by default. The change is kept limited to only
Cortex-A9 MPCore detection code.
Note that if any future SoC *does* use 0x0 as the PERIPH_BASE, then
the SCU address check code needs to be #ifdef'd for for the Aegis
platform.
Acked-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/kernel/head.S | 21 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S index 2c7cc1e03473..476de57dcef2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S @@ -487,7 +487,26 @@ __fixup_smp: mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 5 @ read MPIDR and r0, r0, #0xc0000000 @ multiprocessing extensions and teq r0, #0x80000000 @ not part of a uniprocessor system? - moveq pc, lr @ yes, assume SMP + bne __fixup_smp_on_up @ no, assume UP + + @ Core indicates it is SMP. Check for Aegis SOC where a single + @ Cortex-A9 CPU is present but SMP operations fault. + mov r4, #0x41000000 + orr r4, r4, #0x0000c000 + orr r4, r4, #0x00000090 + teq r3, r4 @ Check for ARM Cortex-A9 + movne pc, lr @ Not ARM Cortex-A9, + + @ If a future SoC *does* use 0x0 as the PERIPH_BASE, then the + @ below address check will need to be #ifdef'd or equivalent + @ for the Aegis platform. + mrc p15, 4, r0, c15, c0 @ get SCU base address + teq r0, #0x0 @ '0' on actual UP A9 hardware + beq __fixup_smp_on_up @ So its an A9 UP + ldr r0, [r0, #4] @ read SCU Config + and r0, r0, #0x3 @ number of CPUs + teq r0, #0x0 @ is 1? + movne pc, lr __fixup_smp_on_up: adr r0, 1f |