summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>2012-11-26 13:55:25 +0800
committerJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>2012-12-03 04:57:15 -0500
commit0d0cdb028f9d9771e2b346038707734121f906e3 (patch)
tree0bae4e559e963bdc1b487806848b5df7021a3283 /drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
parenta52f514c911978dee418f19d1d0103e3bc25fa62 (diff)
downloadlinux-0d0cdb028f9d9771e2b346038707734121f906e3.tar.gz
linux-0d0cdb028f9d9771e2b346038707734121f906e3.tar.bz2
linux-0d0cdb028f9d9771e2b346038707734121f906e3.zip
libata: restore acpi disable functionality
Commit 66fa7f215 "libata-acpi: improve ACPI disabling" introdcued the behaviour of disabling ATA ACPI if ata_acpi_on_devcfg failed the 2nd time, but commit 30dcf76ac dropped this behaviour and this caused problem for Dimitris Damigos, where his laptop can not resume correctly. The bugzilla page for it is: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49331 The problem is, ata_dev_push_id will fail the 2nd time it is invoked, and due to disabling ACPI code is dropped, ata_acpi_on_devcfg which calls ata_dev_push_id will keep failing and eventually made the device disabled. This patch restores the original behaviour, if acpi failed the 2nd time, disable acpi functionality for the device(and we do not event need to add a debug message for this as it is still there ;-). Reported-by: Dimitris Damigos <damigos@freemail.gr> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
index 5b0ba3f20edc..ef01ac07502e 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ acpi_handle ata_dev_acpi_handle(struct ata_device *dev)
acpi_integer adr;
struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
+ if (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_ACPI_DISABLED)
+ return NULL;
+
if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA) {
if (!sata_pmp_attached(ap))
adr = SATA_ADR(ap->port_no, NO_PORT_MULT);
@@ -945,6 +948,7 @@ int ata_acpi_on_devcfg(struct ata_device *dev)
return rc;
}
+ dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_ACPI_DISABLED;
ata_dev_warn(dev, "ACPI: failed the second time, disabled\n");
/* We can safely continue if no _GTF command has been executed