libata: beef up iterators

There currently are the following looping constructs.

* __ata_port_for_each_link() for all available links
* ata_port_for_each_link() for edge links
* ata_link_for_each_dev() for all devices
* ata_link_for_each_dev_reverse() for all devices in reverse order

Now there's a need for looping construct which is similar to
__ata_port_for_each_link() but iterates over PMP links before the host
link.  Instead of adding another one with long name, do the following
cleanup.

* Implement and export ata_link_next() and ata_dev_next() which take
  @mode parameter and can be used to build custom loop.
* Implement ata_for_each_link() and ata_for_each_dev() which take
  looping mode explicitly.

The following iteration modes are implemented.

* ATA_LITER_EDGE		: loop over edge links
* ATA_LITER_HOST_FIRST		: loop over all links, host link first
* ATA_LITER_PMP_FIRST		: loop over all links, PMP links first

* ATA_DITER_ENABLED		: loop over enabled devices
* ATA_DITER_ENABLED_REVERSE	: loop over enabled devices in reverse order
* ATA_DITER_ALL			: loop over all devices
* ATA_DITER_ALL_REVERSE		: loop over all devices in reverse order

This change removes exlicit device enabledness checks from many loops
and makes it clear which ones are iterated over in which direction.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
index c012307d0ba6..ef02e488d468 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void ata_acpi_associate_sata_port(struct ata_port *ap)
 
 		ap->link.device->acpi_handle = NULL;
 
-		ata_port_for_each_link(link, ap) {
+		ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) {
 			acpi_integer adr = SATA_ADR(ap->port_no, link->pmp);
 
 			link->device->acpi_handle =
@@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ static void ata_acpi_detach_device(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *dev)
 		struct ata_link *tlink;
 		struct ata_device *tdev;
 
-		ata_port_for_each_link(tlink, ap)
-			ata_link_for_each_dev(tdev, tlink)
+		ata_for_each_link(tlink, ap, EDGE)
+			ata_for_each_dev(tdev, tlink, ALL)
 				tdev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_DETACH;
 	}
 
@@ -588,12 +588,9 @@ int ata_acpi_cbl_80wire(struct ata_port *ap, const struct ata_acpi_gtm *gtm)
 {
 	struct ata_device *dev;
 
-	ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) {
+	ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ENABLED) {
 		unsigned long xfer_mask, udma_mask;
 
-		if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev))
-			continue;
-
 		xfer_mask = ata_acpi_gtm_xfermask(dev, gtm);
 		ata_unpack_xfermask(xfer_mask, NULL, NULL, &udma_mask);
 
@@ -893,7 +890,7 @@ void ata_acpi_on_resume(struct ata_port *ap)
 		 * use values set by _STM.  Cache _GTF result and
 		 * schedule _GTF.
 		 */
-		ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) {
+		ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ALL) {
 			ata_acpi_clear_gtf(dev);
 			if (ata_dev_enabled(dev) &&
 			    ata_dev_get_GTF(dev, NULL) >= 0)
@@ -904,7 +901,7 @@ void ata_acpi_on_resume(struct ata_port *ap)
 		 * there's no reason to evaluate IDE _GTF early
 		 * without _STM.  Clear cache and schedule _GTF.
 		 */
-		ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) {
+		ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ALL) {
 			ata_acpi_clear_gtf(dev);
 			if (ata_dev_enabled(dev))
 				dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_ACPI_PENDING;
@@ -932,8 +929,8 @@ void ata_acpi_set_state(struct ata_port *ap, pm_message_t state)
 	if (state.event == PM_EVENT_ON)
 		acpi_bus_set_power(ap->acpi_handle, ACPI_STATE_D0);
 
-	ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) {
-		if (dev->acpi_handle && ata_dev_enabled(dev))
+	ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ENABLED) {
+		if (dev->acpi_handle)
 			acpi_bus_set_power(dev->acpi_handle,
 				state.event == PM_EVENT_ON ?
 					ACPI_STATE_D0 : ACPI_STATE_D3);