[CPUFREQ] Fix ondemand vs suspend deadlock

Rootcaused the bug to a deadlock in cpufreq and ondemand. Due to non-existent
ordering between cpu_hotplug lock and dbs_mutex. Basically a race condition
between cpu_down() and do_dbs_timer().

cpu_down() flow:
* cpu_down() call for CPU 1
* Takes hot plug lock
* Calls pre down notifier
*     cpufreq notifier handler calls cpufreq_driver_target() which takes
      cpu_hotplug lock again. OK as cpu_hotplug lock is recursive in same
      process context
* CPU 1 goes down
* Calls post down notifier
*     cpufreq notifier handler calls ondemand event stop which takes dbs_mutex

So, cpu_hotplug lock is taken before dbs_mutex in this flow.

do_dbs_timer is triggerred by a periodic timer event.
It first takes dbs_mutex and then takes cpu_hotplug lock in
cpufreq_driver_target().
Note the reverse order here compared to above. So, if this timer event happens
at right moment during cpu_down, system will deadlok.

Attached patch fixes the issue for both ondemand and conservative.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 3e6ffcaa5af4..4d308410b60e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -71,6 +71,14 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cpu_dbs_info);
 
 static unsigned int dbs_enable;	/* number of CPUs using this policy */
 
+/*
+ * DEADLOCK ALERT! There is a ordering requirement between cpu_hotplug
+ * lock and dbs_mutex. cpu_hotplug lock should always be held before
+ * dbs_mutex. If any function that can potentially take cpu_hotplug lock
+ * (like __cpufreq_driver_target()) is being called with dbs_mutex taken, then
+ * cpu_hotplug lock should be taken before that. Note that cpu_hotplug lock
+ * is recursive for the same process. -Venki
+ */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX (dbs_mutex);
 static DECLARE_WORK	(dbs_work, do_dbs_timer, NULL);
 
@@ -363,12 +371,14 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
 static void do_dbs_timer(void *data)
 {
 	int i;
+	lock_cpu_hotplug();
 	mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
 	for_each_online_cpu(i)
 		dbs_check_cpu(i);
 	queue_delayed_work(dbs_workq, &dbs_work,
 			   usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate));
 	mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
+	unlock_cpu_hotplug();
 }
 
 static inline void dbs_timer_init(void)
@@ -469,6 +479,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		break;
 
 	case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
+		lock_cpu_hotplug();
 		mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
 		if (policy->max < this_dbs_info->cur_policy->cur)
 			__cpufreq_driver_target(
@@ -479,6 +490,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
 					policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
 		mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
+		unlock_cpu_hotplug();
 		break;
 	}
 	return 0;