diff options
| author | Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com> | 2014-06-18 11:27:32 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2014-06-18 21:52:20 +0200 |
| commit | fefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c (patch) | |
| tree | 6118b6695bc29d4bad0a0cdb36ee295903574711 /drivers/cpufreq | |
| parent | 51d211e9c334b9eca3505f4052afa660c3e0606b (diff) | |
| download | linux-fefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c.tar.gz linux-fefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c.tar.bz2 linux-fefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c.zip | |
cpufreq: unlock when failing cpufreq_update_policy()
Commit bd0fa9bb455d introduced a failure path to cpufreq_update_policy() if
cpufreq_driver->get(cpu) returns NULL. However, it jumps to the 'no_policy'
label, which exits without unlocking any of the locks the function acquired
earlier. This causes later calls into cpufreq to hang.
Fix this by creating a new 'unlock' label and jumping to that instead.
Fixes: bd0fa9bb455d ("cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy()")
Link: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/751903/kernel-3-15-and-nv-drivers-337-340-failed-to-initialize-the-nvidia-kernel-module-gtx-550-ti-/
Signed-off-by: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index aed2b0cb83dc..62259d27f03e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2242,10 +2242,8 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) struct cpufreq_policy new_policy; int ret; - if (!policy) { - ret = -ENODEV; - goto no_policy; - } + if (!policy) + return -ENODEV; down_write(&policy->rwsem); @@ -2264,7 +2262,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) new_policy.cur = cpufreq_driver->get(cpu); if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) { ret = -EIO; - goto no_policy; + goto unlock; } if (!policy->cur) { @@ -2279,10 +2277,10 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); +unlock: up_write(&policy->rwsem); cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); -no_policy: return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); |