summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2019-06-20 08:35:50 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2019-06-28 11:24:56 +0200
commit70a59fde6e69d1d8579f84bf4555bfffb3ce452d (patch)
tree53863dd8106c2f2a564da43055a3e1154da2895f /drivers/cpufreq
parent5980752e6ef7079c0839576df10f8062d8a48883 (diff)
downloadlinux-70a59fde6e69d1d8579f84bf4555bfffb3ce452d.tar.gz
linux-70a59fde6e69d1d8579f84bf4555bfffb3ce452d.tar.bz2
linux-70a59fde6e69d1d8579f84bf4555bfffb3ce452d.zip
cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() from handle_update()
On some occasions cpufreq_verify_current_freq() schedules a work whose callback is handle_update(), which further calls cpufreq_update_policy() which may end up calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() again. On the other hand, when cpufreq_update_policy() is called from handle_update(), the pointer to the cpufreq policy is already available, but cpufreq_cpu_acquire() is still called to get it in cpufreq_update_policy(), which should be avoided as well. To fix these issues, create a new helper, refresh_frequency_limits(), and make both handle_update() call it cpufreq_update_policy(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Rename reeval_frequency_limits() as refresh_frequency_limits() ] [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c26
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index cba9c9e1bd0f..ceb57af15ca0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1115,13 +1115,25 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
return ret;
}
+static void refresh_frequency_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_policy new_policy = *policy;
+
+ pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);
+
+ new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min;
+ new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max;
+
+ cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+}
+
static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy =
container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update);
- unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
- pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu);
- cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
+
+ pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", policy->cpu);
+ refresh_frequency_limits(policy);
}
static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -2376,7 +2388,6 @@ int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_acquire(cpu);
- struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;
if (!policy)
return;
@@ -2389,12 +2400,7 @@ void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
(cpufreq_suspended || WARN_ON(!cpufreq_verify_current_freq(policy, false))))
goto unlock;
- pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu);
- memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
- new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min;
- new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max;
-
- cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+ refresh_frequency_limits(policy);
unlock:
cpufreq_cpu_release(policy);