diff options
| author | Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> | 2009-02-24 20:31:53 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> | 2009-02-25 14:47:05 +1000 |
| commit | d61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8 (patch) | |
| tree | fd973d660e31ca7cc2495c3fee0db7f63ca1fcf0 /drivers/gpu | |
| parent | b3f5e7329df1a508ac58ebe7509fb7a47b9eab6a (diff) | |
| download | linux-d61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8.tar.gz linux-d61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8.tar.bz2 linux-d61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8.zip | |
drm: edid revision 0 is valid
edid->revision == 0 should be valid (at least, so the error message
indicates. :) and wikipedia seems to indicate that EDID 1.0 existed.
We can dump the entire check, since edid->revision is a u8, so
it can't ever be less than 0.
Marko reports in RH bz#476735 that his monitor claims to be
EDID 1.0, and therefore hits the check and is stuck at 800x600 because
of it.
Reported-by: Marko Ristola <marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi>
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c index e902b1cefc06..a839a28d8ee6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static bool edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid) DRM_ERROR("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n", edid->version); goto bad; } - if (edid->revision <= 0 || edid->revision > 3) { + if (edid->revision > 3) { DRM_ERROR("EDID has minor version %d, which is not between 0-3\n", edid->revision); goto bad; } |