summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>2008-08-16 13:36:47 +0200
committerStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>2008-08-19 18:47:55 +0200
commit6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05 (patch)
treecc52f981e49461426bc747821d0c133de20d7134 /drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
parent1fca25427482387689fa27594c992a961d98768f (diff)
downloadlinux-6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05.tar.gz
linux-6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05.tar.bz2
linux-6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05.zip
ieee1394: regression in 2.6.25: updates should happen before probes
Regression since commit 73cf60232ef16e1f8a64defa97214a1722db1e6c, "ieee1394: use class iteration api": The two loops for (1.) driver updates and (2.) driver probes were replaced by a single loop with bogus needs_probe checks. Hence updates and probes were now intermixed, and especially sbp2 updates (reconnects) held up longer than necessary. While we fix it, change the needs_probe flag to bool type for clarity. Tested by Damien Benoist. Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c29
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c b/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
index 994a21e5a0aa..2ebd09a89427 100644
--- a/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
+++ b/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static struct node_entry *nodemgr_create_node(octlet_t guid, struct csr1212_csr
ne->host = host;
ne->nodeid = nodeid;
ne->generation = generation;
- ne->needs_probe = 1;
+ ne->needs_probe = true;
ne->guid = guid;
ne->guid_vendor_id = (guid >> 40) & 0xffffff;
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static void nodemgr_process_root_directory(struct host_info *hi, struct node_ent
struct csr1212_keyval *kv, *vendor_name_kv = NULL;
u8 last_key_id = 0;
- ne->needs_probe = 0;
+ ne->needs_probe = false;
csr1212_for_each_dir_entry(ne->csr, kv, ne->csr->root_kv, dentry) {
switch (kv->key.id) {
@@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ static void nodemgr_update_node(struct node_entry *ne, struct csr1212_csr *csr,
nodemgr_update_bus_options(ne);
/* Mark the node as new, so it gets re-probed */
- ne->needs_probe = 1;
+ ne->needs_probe = true;
} else {
/* old cache is valid, so update its generation */
struct nodemgr_csr_info *ci = ne->csr->private;
@@ -1566,28 +1566,27 @@ static void nodemgr_probe_ne(struct host_info *hi, struct node_entry *ne, int ge
struct probe_param {
struct host_info *hi;
int generation;
+ bool probe_now;
};
-static int __nodemgr_node_probe(struct device *dev, void *data)
+static int node_probe(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
- struct probe_param *param = (struct probe_param *)data;
+ struct probe_param *p = data;
struct node_entry *ne;
ne = container_of(dev, struct node_entry, node_dev);
- if (!ne->needs_probe)
- nodemgr_probe_ne(param->hi, ne, param->generation);
- if (ne->needs_probe)
- nodemgr_probe_ne(param->hi, ne, param->generation);
+ if (ne->needs_probe == p->probe_now)
+ nodemgr_probe_ne(p->hi, ne, p->generation);
return 0;
}
static void nodemgr_node_probe(struct host_info *hi, int generation)
{
struct hpsb_host *host = hi->host;
- struct probe_param param;
+ struct probe_param p;
- param.hi = hi;
- param.generation = generation;
+ p.hi = hi;
+ p.generation = generation;
/* Do some processing of the nodes we've probed. This pulls them
* into the sysfs layer if needed, and can result in processing of
* unit-directories, or just updating the node and it's
@@ -1597,8 +1596,10 @@ static void nodemgr_node_probe(struct host_info *hi, int generation)
* while probes are time-consuming. (Well, those probes need some
* improvement...) */
- class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, NULL, &param,
- __nodemgr_node_probe);
+ p.probe_now = false;
+ class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, NULL, &p, node_probe);
+ p.probe_now = true;
+ class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, NULL, &p, node_probe);
/* If we had a bus reset while we were scanning the bus, it is
* possible that we did not probe all nodes. In that case, we