diff options
author | Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> | 2008-08-16 13:36:47 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> | 2008-08-19 18:47:55 +0200 |
commit | 6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05 (patch) | |
tree | cc52f981e49461426bc747821d0c133de20d7134 /drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c | |
parent | 1fca25427482387689fa27594c992a961d98768f (diff) | |
download | linux-6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05.tar.gz linux-6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05.tar.bz2 linux-6848408abf1bc18d9a4d5fed3fcca812745ece05.zip |
ieee1394: regression in 2.6.25: updates should happen before probes
Regression since commit 73cf60232ef16e1f8a64defa97214a1722db1e6c,
"ieee1394: use class iteration api": The two loops for (1.) driver
updates and (2.) driver probes were replaced by a single loop with
bogus needs_probe checks. Hence updates and probes were now intermixed,
and especially sbp2 updates (reconnects) held up longer than necessary.
While we fix it, change the needs_probe flag to bool type for clarity.
Tested by Damien Benoist.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c | 29 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c b/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c index 994a21e5a0aa..2ebd09a89427 100644 --- a/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c +++ b/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static struct node_entry *nodemgr_create_node(octlet_t guid, struct csr1212_csr ne->host = host; ne->nodeid = nodeid; ne->generation = generation; - ne->needs_probe = 1; + ne->needs_probe = true; ne->guid = guid; ne->guid_vendor_id = (guid >> 40) & 0xffffff; @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static void nodemgr_process_root_directory(struct host_info *hi, struct node_ent struct csr1212_keyval *kv, *vendor_name_kv = NULL; u8 last_key_id = 0; - ne->needs_probe = 0; + ne->needs_probe = false; csr1212_for_each_dir_entry(ne->csr, kv, ne->csr->root_kv, dentry) { switch (kv->key.id) { @@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ static void nodemgr_update_node(struct node_entry *ne, struct csr1212_csr *csr, nodemgr_update_bus_options(ne); /* Mark the node as new, so it gets re-probed */ - ne->needs_probe = 1; + ne->needs_probe = true; } else { /* old cache is valid, so update its generation */ struct nodemgr_csr_info *ci = ne->csr->private; @@ -1566,28 +1566,27 @@ static void nodemgr_probe_ne(struct host_info *hi, struct node_entry *ne, int ge struct probe_param { struct host_info *hi; int generation; + bool probe_now; }; -static int __nodemgr_node_probe(struct device *dev, void *data) +static int node_probe(struct device *dev, void *data) { - struct probe_param *param = (struct probe_param *)data; + struct probe_param *p = data; struct node_entry *ne; ne = container_of(dev, struct node_entry, node_dev); - if (!ne->needs_probe) - nodemgr_probe_ne(param->hi, ne, param->generation); - if (ne->needs_probe) - nodemgr_probe_ne(param->hi, ne, param->generation); + if (ne->needs_probe == p->probe_now) + nodemgr_probe_ne(p->hi, ne, p->generation); return 0; } static void nodemgr_node_probe(struct host_info *hi, int generation) { struct hpsb_host *host = hi->host; - struct probe_param param; + struct probe_param p; - param.hi = hi; - param.generation = generation; + p.hi = hi; + p.generation = generation; /* Do some processing of the nodes we've probed. This pulls them * into the sysfs layer if needed, and can result in processing of * unit-directories, or just updating the node and it's @@ -1597,8 +1596,10 @@ static void nodemgr_node_probe(struct host_info *hi, int generation) * while probes are time-consuming. (Well, those probes need some * improvement...) */ - class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, NULL, ¶m, - __nodemgr_node_probe); + p.probe_now = false; + class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, NULL, &p, node_probe); + p.probe_now = true; + class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, NULL, &p, node_probe); /* If we had a bus reset while we were scanning the bus, it is * possible that we did not probe all nodes. In that case, we |