summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>2007-10-22 11:03:31 +1000
committerRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>2007-10-23 15:49:52 +1000
commitb410e7b1499c49513cab18275db8a8ab549d9e09 (patch)
tree8a71fa34660f5ccc9d71677137c5ae211a38bbf2 /drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
parentcc6d4fbcef328acdc9fa7023e69f39f753f72fe1 (diff)
downloadlinux-b410e7b1499c49513cab18275db8a8ab549d9e09.tar.gz
linux-b410e7b1499c49513cab18275db8a8ab549d9e09.tar.bz2
linux-b410e7b1499c49513cab18275db8a8ab549d9e09.zip
Make hypercalls arch-independent.
Clean up the hypercall code to make the code in hypercalls.c architecture independent. First process the common hypercalls and then call lguest_arch_do_hcall() if the call hasn't been handled. Rename struct hcall_ring to hcall_args. This patch requires the previous patch which reorganize the layout of struct lguest_regs on i386 so they match the layout of struct hcall_args. Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c104
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
index 0175a9f03347..2859a7687288 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
@@ -25,17 +25,13 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
-#include <irq_vectors.h>
#include "lg.h"
-/*H:120 This is the core hypercall routine: where the Guest gets what it
- * wants. Or gets killed. Or, in the case of LHCALL_CRASH, both.
- *
- * Remember from the Guest: %eax == which call to make, and the arguments are
- * packed into %edx, %ebx and %ecx if needed. */
-static void do_hcall(struct lguest *lg, struct lguest_regs *regs)
+/*H:120 This is the core hypercall routine: where the Guest gets what it wants.
+ * Or gets killed. Or, in the case of LHCALL_CRASH, both. */
+static void do_hcall(struct lguest *lg, struct hcall_args *args)
{
- switch (regs->eax) {
+ switch (args->arg0) {
case LHCALL_FLUSH_ASYNC:
/* This call does nothing, except by breaking out of the Guest
* it makes us process all the asynchronous hypercalls. */
@@ -51,7 +47,7 @@ static void do_hcall(struct lguest *lg, struct lguest_regs *regs)
char msg[128];
/* If the lgread fails, it will call kill_guest() itself; the
* kill_guest() with the message will be ignored. */
- lgread(lg, msg, regs->edx, sizeof(msg));
+ lgread(lg, msg, args->arg1, sizeof(msg));
msg[sizeof(msg)-1] = '\0';
kill_guest(lg, "CRASH: %s", msg);
break;
@@ -59,7 +55,7 @@ static void do_hcall(struct lguest *lg, struct lguest_regs *regs)
case LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB:
/* FLUSH_TLB comes in two flavors, depending on the
* argument: */
- if (regs->edx)
+ if (args->arg1)
guest_pagetable_clear_all(lg);
else
guest_pagetable_flush_user(lg);
@@ -71,55 +67,47 @@ static void do_hcall(struct lguest *lg, struct lguest_regs *regs)
* it here. This can legitimately fail, since we currently
* place a limit on the number of DMA pools a Guest can have.
* So we return true or false from this call. */
- regs->eax = bind_dma(lg, regs->edx, regs->ebx,
- regs->ecx >> 8, regs->ecx & 0xFF);
+ args->arg0 = bind_dma(lg, args->arg1, args->arg2,
+ args->arg3 >> 8, args->arg3 & 0xFF);
break;
/* All these calls simply pass the arguments through to the right
* routines. */
case LHCALL_SEND_DMA:
- send_dma(lg, regs->edx, regs->ebx);
- break;
- case LHCALL_LOAD_GDT:
- load_guest_gdt(lg, regs->edx, regs->ebx);
- break;
- case LHCALL_LOAD_IDT_ENTRY:
- load_guest_idt_entry(lg, regs->edx, regs->ebx, regs->ecx);
+ send_dma(lg, args->arg1, args->arg2);
break;
case LHCALL_NEW_PGTABLE:
- guest_new_pagetable(lg, regs->edx);
+ guest_new_pagetable(lg, args->arg1);
break;
case LHCALL_SET_STACK:
- guest_set_stack(lg, regs->edx, regs->ebx, regs->ecx);
+ guest_set_stack(lg, args->arg1, args->arg2, args->arg3);
break;
case LHCALL_SET_PTE:
- guest_set_pte(lg, regs->edx, regs->ebx, mkgpte(regs->ecx));
+ guest_set_pte(lg, args->arg1, args->arg2, mkgpte(args->arg3));
break;
case LHCALL_SET_PMD:
- guest_set_pmd(lg, regs->edx, regs->ebx);
- break;
- case LHCALL_LOAD_TLS:
- guest_load_tls(lg, regs->edx);
+ guest_set_pmd(lg, args->arg1, args->arg2);
break;
case LHCALL_SET_CLOCKEVENT:
- guest_set_clockevent(lg, regs->edx);
+ guest_set_clockevent(lg, args->arg1);
break;
-
case LHCALL_TS:
/* This sets the TS flag, as we saw used in run_guest(). */
- lg->ts = regs->edx;
+ lg->ts = args->arg1;
break;
case LHCALL_HALT:
/* Similarly, this sets the halted flag for run_guest(). */
lg->halted = 1;
break;
default:
- kill_guest(lg, "Bad hypercall %li\n", regs->eax);
+ if (lguest_arch_do_hcall(lg, args))
+ kill_guest(lg, "Bad hypercall %li\n", args->arg0);
}
}
+/*:*/
-/* Asynchronous hypercalls are easy: we just look in the array in the Guest's
- * "struct lguest_data" and see if there are any new ones marked "ready".
+/*H:124 Asynchronous hypercalls are easy: we just look in the array in the
+ * Guest's "struct lguest_data" to see if any new ones are marked "ready".
*
* We are careful to do these in order: obviously we respect the order the
* Guest put them in the ring, but we also promise the Guest that they will
@@ -134,10 +122,9 @@ static void do_async_hcalls(struct lguest *lg)
if (copy_from_user(&st, &lg->lguest_data->hcall_status, sizeof(st)))
return;
-
/* We process "struct lguest_data"s hcalls[] ring once. */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(st); i++) {
- struct lguest_regs regs;
+ struct hcall_args args;
/* We remember where we were up to from last time. This makes
* sure that the hypercalls are done in the order the Guest
* places them in the ring. */
@@ -152,18 +139,16 @@ static void do_async_hcalls(struct lguest *lg)
if (++lg->next_hcall == LHCALL_RING_SIZE)
lg->next_hcall = 0;
- /* We copy the hypercall arguments into a fake register
- * structure. This makes life simple for do_hcall(). */
- if (get_user(regs.eax, &lg->lguest_data->hcalls[n].eax)
- || get_user(regs.edx, &lg->lguest_data->hcalls[n].edx)
- || get_user(regs.ecx, &lg->lguest_data->hcalls[n].ecx)
- || get_user(regs.ebx, &lg->lguest_data->hcalls[n].ebx)) {
+ /* Copy the hypercall arguments into a local copy of
+ * the hcall_args struct. */
+ if (copy_from_user(&args, &lg->lguest_data->hcalls[n],
+ sizeof(struct hcall_args))) {
kill_guest(lg, "Fetching async hypercalls");
break;
}
/* Do the hypercall, same as a normal one. */
- do_hcall(lg, &regs);
+ do_hcall(lg, &args);
/* Mark the hypercall done. */
if (put_user(0xFF, &lg->lguest_data->hcall_status[n])) {
@@ -182,41 +167,16 @@ static void do_async_hcalls(struct lguest *lg)
* Guest makes a hypercall, we end up here to set things up: */
static void initialize(struct lguest *lg)
{
- u32 tsc_speed;
/* You can't do anything until you're initialized. The Guest knows the
* rules, so we're unforgiving here. */
- if (lg->regs->eax != LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT) {
- kill_guest(lg, "hypercall %li before LGUEST_INIT",
- lg->regs->eax);
+ if (lg->hcall->arg0 != LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT) {
+ kill_guest(lg, "hypercall %li before INIT", lg->hcall->arg0);
return;
}
- /* We insist that the Time Stamp Counter exist and doesn't change with
- * cpu frequency. Some devious chip manufacturers decided that TSC
- * changes could be handled in software. I decided that time going
- * backwards might be good for benchmarks, but it's bad for users.
- *
- * We also insist that the TSC be stable: the kernel detects unreliable
- * TSCs for its own purposes, and we use that here. */
- if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) && !check_tsc_unstable())
- tsc_speed = tsc_khz;
- else
- tsc_speed = 0;
-
- /* The pointer to the Guest's "struct lguest_data" is the only
- * argument. We check that address now. */
- if (!lguest_address_ok(lg, lg->regs->edx, sizeof(*lg->lguest_data))) {
+ if (lguest_arch_init_hypercalls(lg))
kill_guest(lg, "bad guest page %p", lg->lguest_data);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Having checked it, we simply set lg->lguest_data to point straight
- * into the Launcher's memory at the right place and then use
- * copy_to_user/from_user from now on, instead of lgread/write. I put
- * this in to show that I'm not immune to writing stupid
- * optimizations. */
- lg->lguest_data = lg->mem_base + lg->regs->edx;
/* The Guest tells us where we're not to deliver interrupts by putting
* the range of addresses into "struct lguest_data". */
@@ -224,8 +184,7 @@ static void initialize(struct lguest *lg)
|| get_user(lg->noirq_end, &lg->lguest_data->noirq_end)
/* We tell the Guest that it can't use the top 4MB of virtual
* addresses used by the Switcher. */
- || put_user(4U*1024*1024, &lg->lguest_data->reserve_mem)
- || put_user(tsc_speed, &lg->lguest_data->tsc_khz))
+ || put_user(4U*1024*1024, &lg->lguest_data->reserve_mem))
kill_guest(lg, "bad guest page %p", lg->lguest_data);
/* We write the current time into the Guest's data page once now. */
@@ -237,9 +196,6 @@ static void initialize(struct lguest *lg)
* page. */
guest_pagetable_clear_all(lg);
}
-/* Now we've examined the hypercall code; our Guest can make requests. There
- * is one other way we can do things for the Guest, as we see in
- * emulate_insn(). */
/*H:100
* Hypercalls