diff options
| author | FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> | 2009-06-22 16:54:27 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-06-22 11:29:00 -0700 |
| commit | dfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0 (patch) | |
| tree | 25726788fc2476e25dafff3ce163084531f7ddfd /drivers/parport | |
| parent | e2434dc1c19412639dd047a4d4eff8ed0e5d0d50 (diff) | |
| download | linux-dfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0.tar.gz linux-dfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0.tar.bz2 linux-dfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0.zip | |
parport_pc: set properly the dma_mask for parport_pc device
parport_pc_probe_port() creates the own 'parport_pc' device if the
device argument is NULL. Then parport_pc_probe_port() doesn't
initialize the dma_mask and coherent_dma_mask of the device and calls
dma_alloc_coherent with it. dma_alloc_coherent fails because
dma_alloc_coherent() doesn't accept the uninitialized dma_mask:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/16/150
Long ago, X86_32 and X86_64 had the own dma_alloc_coherent
implementations; X86_32 accepted a device having dma_mask that is not
initialized however X86_64 didn't. When we merged them, we chose to
prohibit a device having dma_mask that is not initialized. I think
that it's good to require drivers to set up dma_mask (and
coherent_dma_mask) properly if the drivers want DMA.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reported-by: Malcom Blaney <malcolm.blaney@maptek.com.au>
Tested-by: Malcom Blaney <malcolm.blaney@maptek.com.au>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/parport')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/parport/parport_pc.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c index 7f1cca701c11..1032d5fdbd42 100644 --- a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c +++ b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c @@ -2290,6 +2290,9 @@ struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port(unsigned long int base, if (IS_ERR(pdev)) return NULL; dev = &pdev->dev; + + dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(24); + dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask; } ops = kmalloc(sizeof(struct parport_operations), GFP_KERNEL); |