tty: Remove tty_wait_until_sent_from_close()

tty_wait_until_sent_from_close() drops the tty lock while waiting
for the tty driver to finish sending previously accepted data (ie.,
data remaining in its write buffer and transmit fifo).

tty_wait_until_sent_from_close() was added by commit a57a7bf3fc7e
("TTY: define tty_wait_until_sent_from_close") to prevent the entire
tty subsystem from being unable to open new ttys while waiting for
one tty to close while output drained.

However, since commit 0911261d4cb6 ("tty: Don't take tty_mutex for tty
count changes"), holding a tty lock while closing does not prevent other
ttys from being opened/closed/hung up, but only prevents lifetime event
changes for the tty under lock.

Holding the tty lock while waiting for output to drain does prevent
parallel non-blocking opens (O_NONBLOCK) from advancing or returning
while the tty lock is held. However, all parallel opens _already_
block even if the tty lock is dropped while closing and the parallel
open advances. Blocking in open has been in mainline since at least 2.6.29
(see tty_port_block_til_ready(); note the test for O_NONBLOCK is _after_
the wait while ASYNC_CLOSING).

IOW, before this patch a non-blocking open will sleep anyway for the
_entire_ duration of a parallel hardware shutdown, and when it wakes, the
error return will cause a release of its tty, and it will restart with
a fresh attempt to open. Similarly with a blocking open that is already
waiting; when it's woken, the hardware shutdown has already completed
to ASYNC_INITIALIZED is not set, which forces a release and restart as
well.

So, holding the tty lock across the _entire_ close (which is what this
patch does), even while waiting for output to drain, is equivalent to
the current outcome wrt parallel opens.

Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>
CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
index 9c30f67c802a..e46d628998f5 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static void hvc_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * filp)
 		 * there is no buffered data otherwise sleeps on a wait queue
 		 * waking periodically to check chars_in_buffer().
 		 */
-		tty_wait_until_sent_from_close(tty, HVC_CLOSE_WAIT);
+		tty_wait_until_sent(tty, HVC_CLOSE_WAIT);
 	} else {
 		if (hp->port.count < 0)
 			printk(KERN_ERR "hvc_close %X: oops, count is %d\n",
diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
index f7ff97c0ad34..5997b1731111 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
@@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static void hvcs_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
 		irq = hvcsd->vdev->irq;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
 
-		tty_wait_until_sent_from_close(tty, HVCS_CLOSE_WAIT);
+		tty_wait_until_sent(tty, HVCS_CLOSE_WAIT);
 
 		/*
 		 * This line is important because it tells hvcs_open that this