diff options
author | Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> | 2014-08-22 10:18:44 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> | 2014-09-09 16:01:09 -0400 |
commit | 09802fd2a8caea2a2147fca8d7975697c5de573d (patch) | |
tree | 99f87c52a0921d3eaa9796a349784bf676bc3b3c /fs/bfs | |
parent | aef9583b234a4ecdbcaf2c3024f29d4244b18e83 (diff) | |
download | linux-09802fd2a8caea2a2147fca8d7975697c5de573d.tar.gz linux-09802fd2a8caea2a2147fca8d7975697c5de573d.tar.bz2 linux-09802fd2a8caea2a2147fca8d7975697c5de573d.zip |
lockd: rip out deferred lock handling from testlock codepath
As Kinglong points out, the nlm_block->b_fl field is no longer used at
all. Also, vfs_test_lock in the generic locking code will only return
FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED if FL_SLEEP is set, and it isn't here.
The only other place that returns that value is the DLM lock code, but
it only does that in dlm_posix_lock, never in dlm_posix_get.
Remove all of the deferred locking code from the testlock codepath
since it doesn't appear to ever be used anyway.
I do have a small concern that this might cause a behavior change in the
case where you have a block already sitting on the list when the
testlock request comes in, but that looks like it doesn't really work
properly anyway. I think it's best to just pass that down to
vfs_test_lock and let the filesystem report that instead of trying to
infer what's going on with the lock by looking at an existing block.
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/bfs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions