diff options
| author | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> | 2015-12-08 16:18:51 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2015-12-08 14:50:47 -0500 |
| commit | 8c36e9dfe7527665e286c3ac970c3fb327e6ab24 (patch) | |
| tree | 8b54ea4dab5ef7006ff9d785b8b150497162cd5e /fs/cifs | |
| parent | ffa0160a103917defd5d9c097ae0455a59166e03 (diff) | |
| download | linux-8c36e9dfe7527665e286c3ac970c3fb327e6ab24.tar.gz linux-8c36e9dfe7527665e286c3ac970c3fb327e6ab24.tar.bz2 linux-8c36e9dfe7527665e286c3ac970c3fb327e6ab24.zip | |
cifs: avoid unused variable and label
The newly introduced cifs_clone_file_range() function produces
two harmless compile-time warnings:
cifsfs.c: In function 'cifs_clone_file_range':
cifsfs.c:963:1: warning: label 'out_unlock' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
cifsfs.c:924:20: warning: unused variable 'src_tcon' [-Wunused-variable]
In both cases, removing the extraneous line avoids the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: c6f2a1e2e5f8 ("vfs: pull btrfs clone API to vfs layer")
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/cifs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c index e9b978f2e114..fd3643451dd5 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c @@ -921,7 +921,6 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off, struct inode *target_inode = file_inode(dst_file); struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_src = src_file->private_data; struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data; - struct cifs_tcon *src_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_src->tlink); struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink); unsigned int xid; int rc; @@ -960,7 +959,6 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off, /* force revalidate of size and timestamps of target file now that target is updated on the server */ CIFS_I(target_inode)->time = 0; -out_unlock: /* although unlocking in the reverse order from locking is not strictly necessary here it is a little cleaner to be consistent */ unlock_two_nondirectories(src_inode, target_inode); |