list: fix order of arguments for hlist_add_after(_rcu)

All other add functions for lists have the new item as first argument
and the position where it is added as second argument.  This was changed
for no good reason in this function and makes using it unnecessary
confusing.

The name was changed to hlist_add_behind() to cause unconverted code to
generate a compile error instead of using the wrong parameter order.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Ken Helias <kenhelias@firemail.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>	[intel driver bits]
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
index 74825be65b7b..9ce062218de9 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int fsnotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
 
 	BUG_ON(last == NULL);
 	/* mark should be the last entry.  last is the current last entry */
-	hlist_add_after_rcu(&last->i.i_list, &mark->i.i_list);
+	hlist_add_behind_rcu(&mark->i.i_list, &last->i.i_list);
 out:
 	fsnotify_recalc_inode_mask_locked(inode);
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);