Use helpers to obtain task pid in printks

The task_struct->pid member is going to be deprecated, so start
using the helpers (task_pid_nr/task_pid_vnr/task_pid_nr_ns) in
the kernel.

The first thing to start with is the pid, printed to dmesg - in
this case we may safely use task_pid_nr(). Besides, printks produce
more (much more) than a half of all the explicit pid usage.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: git-drm went and changed lots of stuff]
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

3 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c
index f14b541fab95..9cc7c0418b70 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c
@@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@ static ssize_t o2hb_region_pid_read(struct o2hb_region *reg,
 
 	spin_lock(&o2hb_live_lock);
 	if (reg->hr_task)
-		pid = reg->hr_task->pid;
+		pid = task_pid_nr(reg->hr_task);
 	spin_unlock(&o2hb_live_lock);
 
 	if (!pid)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/masklog.h b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/masklog.h
index 75cd877f6d42..cd046060114e 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/masklog.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/masklog.h
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ extern struct mlog_bits mlog_and_bits, mlog_not_bits;
  * previous token if args expands to nothing.
  */
 #define __mlog_printk(level, fmt, args...)				\
-	printk(level "(%u,%lu):%s:%d " fmt, current->pid,		\
+	printk(level "(%u,%lu):%s:%d " fmt, task_pid_nr(current),	\
 	       __mlog_cpu_guess, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, __LINE__ ,	\
 	       ##args)
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
index a2c33160bfd6..2fde7bf91434 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void dlm_print_reco_node_status(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
 	struct dlm_lock_resource *res;
 
 	mlog(ML_NOTICE, "%s(%d): recovery info, state=%s, dead=%u, master=%u\n",
-	     dlm->name, dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task->pid,
+	     dlm->name, task_pid_nr(dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task),
 	     dlm->reco.state & DLM_RECO_STATE_ACTIVE ? "ACTIVE" : "inactive",
 	     dlm->reco.dead_node, dlm->reco.new_master);
 
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ void dlm_wait_for_recovery(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
 	if (dlm_in_recovery(dlm)) {
 		mlog(0, "%s: reco thread %d in recovery: "
 		     "state=%d, master=%u, dead=%u\n",
-		     dlm->name, dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task->pid,
+		     dlm->name, task_pid_nr(dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task),
 		     dlm->reco.state, dlm->reco.new_master,
 		     dlm->reco.dead_node);
 	}
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int dlm_do_recovery(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
 		return 0;
 	}
 	mlog(0, "%s(%d):recovery thread found node %u in the recovery map!\n",
-	     dlm->name, dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task->pid,
+	     dlm->name, task_pid_nr(dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task),
 	     dlm->reco.dead_node);
 	spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
 
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int dlm_do_recovery(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
 		mlog(0, "another node will master this recovery session.\n");
 	}
 	mlog(0, "dlm=%s (%d), new_master=%u, this node=%u, dead_node=%u\n",
-	     dlm->name, dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task->pid, dlm->reco.new_master,
+	     dlm->name, task_pid_nr(dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task), dlm->reco.new_master,
 	     dlm->node_num, dlm->reco.dead_node);
 
 	/* it is safe to start everything back up here
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static int dlm_do_recovery(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm)
 
 master_here:
 	mlog(0, "(%d) mastering recovery of %s:%u here(this=%u)!\n",
-	     dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task->pid,
+	     task_pid_nr(dlm->dlm_reco_thread_task),
 	     dlm->name, dlm->reco.dead_node, dlm->node_num);
 
 	status = dlm_remaster_locks(dlm, dlm->reco.dead_node);